Cited by 135SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchMedicinal Plant Research

Cannabinoids Block Cellular Entry of SARS-CoV-2 and the Emerging Variants

Open access
van Breemen, Richard B., Muchiri, Ruth N., Bates, Timothy A., Weinstein, Jules B., Leier, Hans C., Farley, Scotland, Tafesse, Fikadu G.·2022·Journal of Natural Products

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide As a complement to vaccines, small-molecule therapeutic agents are needed to treat or prevent infections by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and its variants, which cause COVID-19. Affinity selection–mass spectrometry was used for the discovery of botanical ligands to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Cannabinoid acids from hemp ( Cannabis sativa ) were found to be allosteric as well as orthosteric ligands with micromolar affinity for the spike protein. In follow-up virus neutralization assays, cannabigerolic acid and cannabidiolic acid prevented infection of human epithelial cells by a pseudovirus expressing the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and prevented entry of live SARS-CoV-2 into cells. Importantly, cannabigerolic acid and cannabidiolic acid were equally effective against the SARS-CoV-2 alpha variant B.1.1.7 and the beta variant B.1.351. Orally bioavailable and with a long history of safe human use, these cannabinoids, isolated or in hemp extracts, have the potential to prevent as well as treat infection by SARS-CoV-2.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.1c00946

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both native and affinity MS approaches have been applied with single compounds as well as substrate pools, allowing simultaneous screening of complex natural compound libraries.

    “Both native and affinity MS approaches have been applied with single compounds as well as substrate pools, which allows for the simultaneous screening of complex natural compound libraries26–28.”

    From Native metabolomics identifies the rivulariapeptolide family of protease inhibitors (2022) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Experimental Section (Affinity Selection–Mass Spectrometry; page not provided) reports screening individual cannabinoid standards, mixtures of standards, and extracts using affinity-selection MS. Results and Discussion says this approach is suited to screening natural-product mixtures. The paper does not establish the claim about native MS approaches. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [29]29. van Breemen R. B. Curr. Trends Mass Spectrom. 2020, 18, 18–25.
  2. [31]31. Hazekamp A.; Fischedick J. T.; Díez M. L.; Lubbe A.; Ruhaak R. L. In Comprehensive Natural Products II; Mander L.; Lui H.-W.; Eds.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2010; pp 1033–1084.
  3. [42]42. Nguyen L. C.; Yang D.; Nicolaescu V.; Best T. J.; Ohtsuki T.; Chen S.-N.; Friesen J. B.; Drayman N.; Mohamed A.; Dann C.; Silva D.; Gula H.; Jones K. A.; Millis J. M.; Dickinson B. C.; Tay S.; Oakes S. A.; Pauli G. F.; Meltzer D. O.; Randall G.; Rosner M. R.. bioRxiv 2021, 2021.03.10.432967.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Breemen, R. B., Muchiri, R. N., Bates, T. A., Weinstein, J. B., Leier, H. C., Farley, S., & Tafesse, F. G.
Affiliations
  • Linus Pauling Institute, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Oregon State University, 2900 SW Campus Way, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, United States
  • Oregon State University (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Venue
Journal of Natural Products
Published
2022-01-10
Volume
85
Issue
1
Pages
176-184
ISSN
  • 0163-3864 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6025
OpenAlex
W4205758030
Cited by
135
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 41
FWCI
15.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Natural Products (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32HL083808)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Medicinal Plant Research
Keywords
cannabinoids, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, cannabigerolic acid, cannabidiolic acid, hemp, Cannabis sativa, affinity selection-mass spectrometry, viral entry inhibition, B.1.1.7 variant, B.1.351 variant
MeSH terms
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Drug Treatment, Animals, Antiviral Agents, Benzoates, Cannabinoids, Chlorocebus aethiops, Humans, Ligands, Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Mass Spectrometry, Vero Cells, Virus Internalization, Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review