Cited by 11Ubiquitin and proteasome pathwaysAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications

Degronomics: Mapping the Interacting Peptidome of a Ubiquitin Ligase Using an Integrative Mass Spectrometry Strategy

Open access
Canzani, Daniele, Rusnac, Domniţa-Valeria, Zheng, Ning, Bush, Matthew F.·2019·Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

Human cells make use of hundreds of unique ubiquitin E3 ligases to ensure proteome fidelity and control cellular functions by promoting protein degradation. These processes require exquisite selectivity, but the individual roles of most E3s remain poorly characterized in part due to the challenges associated with identifying, quantifying, and validating substrates for each E3. We report an integrative mass spectrometry (MS) strategy for characterizing protein fragments that interact with KLHDC2, a human E3 that recognizes the extreme C-terminus of substrates. Using a combination of native MS, native top-down MS, MS of destabilized samples, and liquid chromatography MS, we identified and quantified a near complete fraction of the KLHDC2-binding peptidome in E. coli cells. This degronome includes peptides that originate from a variety of proteins. Although all identified protein fragments are terminated by diglycine or glycylalanine, the preceding amino acids are diverse. These results significantly expand our understanding of the sequences that can be recognized by KLHDC2, which provides insight into the potential substrates of this E3 in humans. We anticipate that this integrative MS strategy could be leveraged more broadly to characterize the degronomes of other E3 ligase substrate receptors, including those that adhere to the more common N-end rule for substrate recognition. Therefore, this work advances “degronomics,” i.e., identifying, quantifying, and validating functional E3:peptide interactions in order to determine the individual roles of each E3.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b02331

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In complex-down, the ejected ion (monomer or ligand) is subsequently re-isolated and fragmented in a pseudo-MS3 or MS4 workflow, providing in-depth information on phosphorylation sites, metal ion binding, or sequencing of peptide ligands.

    “The ejected ion – monomer or ligand – is subsequently (re-)isolated and fragmented in a (pseudo-)MS3 or MS4 workflow, providing in-depth information on e.g., phosphorylation sites,104 metal ion binding,36 or sequencing of peptide ligands (see Fig. 3).105”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [30]Bulatov E; Martin EM; Chatterjee S; Knebel A; Shimamura S; Konijnenberg A; Johnson C; Zinn N; Grandi P; Sobott F; Biophysical Studies on Interactions and Assembly of Full-Size E3 Ubiquitin Ligase: SUPPRESSOR OF CYTOKINE SIGNALING 2 (SOCS2)-ELONGIN BC-CULLIN 5-RING BOX PROTEIN 2 (RBX2). J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290 (7), 4178– 4191. 10.1074/jbc.M114.616664. 25505247 PMC4326827 · DOI
  2. [31]Tan X; Calderon-Villalobos LIA; Sharon M; Zheng C; Robinson CV; Estelle M; Zheng N Mechanism of Auxin Perception by the TIR1 Ubiquitin Ligase. Nature 2007, 446, 640 10.1038/nature05731. 17410169 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Canzani, D., Rusnac, D.-V., Zheng, N., & Bush, M. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Pharmacology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Bush, Matthew F.
Venue
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2019-09-17
Volume
91
Issue
20
Pages
12775-12783
ISSN
  • 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6882
OpenAlex
W2974257266
Cited by
11
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Division of Chemistry (CHE-1807382)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Keywords
E3 ubiquitin ligase, substrate recognition, peptidome, protein degradation, native top-down mass spectrometry, native mass spectrometry, Escherichia coli, diglycine, substrate specificity
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Antigens, Neoplasm, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Escherichia coli, Glycylglycine, Humans, Peptides, Protein Binding, Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review