Cited by 39Mass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsProtein Structure and Dynamics

Enhanced Characterization of Membrane Protein Complexes by Ultraviolet Photodissociation Mass Spectrometry

Open access
Sipe, Sarah N., Patrick, John W., Laganowsky, Arthur, Brodbelt, Jennifer S.·2020·Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

Development of chemical chaperones to solubilize membrane protein complexes in aqueous solutions has allowed for gas-phase analysis of their native-like assemblies, including rapid evaluation of stability and interacting partners. Characterization of protein primary sequence, however, has thus far been limited. Ultraviolet photodissociation (UVPD) generates a multitude of sequence ions for the E. coli ammonia channel (AmtB), provides improved localization of a possible post-translational modification of aquaporin Z (AqpZ), and surpasses previous reports of sequence coverage for mechanosensitive channel of large conductance (MscL). Variations in UVPD sequence ion abundance have been shown to correspond to structural changes induced upon some perturbation. Preliminary results are reported here for elucidating increased rigidity or flexibility of MscL when bound to various phospholipids.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b03689

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sipe, S. N., Patrick, J. W., Laganowsky, A., & Brodbelt, J. S.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
Brodbelt, Jennifer S.
Venue
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2019-11-25
Volume
92
Issue
1
Pages
899-907
ISSN
  • 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6882
OpenAlex
W2990475748
Cited by
39
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Welch Foundation (F-1155)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (DP2GM123486, RO1GM121714)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
membrane protein complexes, chemical chaperones, AmtB, aquaporin Z, protein sequence coverage, post-translational modification, gas-phase ion fragmentation, phospholipid binding, Escherichia coli
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Escherichia coli, Ion Channels, Models, Molecular, Photolysis, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Mass Spectrometry, Ultraviolet Rays, Aquaporins, Cation Transport Proteins, Escherichia coli Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review