Cited by 349Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesHeat and Mass Transfer in Porous MediaMesoporous Materials and Catalysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 170 of the 171 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recent Advances in 3D Printing of Structured Materials for Adsorption and Catalysis Applications.

Abstract

Porous solids in the form of adsorbents and catalysts play a crucial role in various industrially important chemical, energy, and environmental processes. Formulating them into structured configurations is a key step toward their scale up and successful implementation at the industrial level. Additive manufacturing, also known as 3D printing, has emerged as an invaluable platform for shape engineering porous solids and fabricating scalable configurations for use in a wide variety of separation and reaction applications. However, formulating porous materials into self-standing configurations can dramatically affect their performance and consequently the efficiency of the process wherein they operate. Toward this end, various research groups around the world have investigated the formulation of porous adsorbents and catalysts into structured scaffolds with complex geometries that not only exhibit comparable or improved performance to that of their powder parents but also address the pressure drop and attrition issues of traditional configurations. In this comprehensive review, we summarize the recent advances and current challenges in the field of adsorption and catalysis to better guide the future directions in shape engineering solid materials with a better control on composition, structure, and properties of 3D-printed adsorbents and catalysts.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00060

Cites

170 of 170 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 171 references

1 of the 171 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 10.1021/acsami.7b11626 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.07.014 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.seppur.2009.10.004 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 349

Metadata

Authors
Lawson, S., Li, X., Thakkar, H., Rownaghi, A. A., & Rezaei, F.
Affiliations
Missouri University of Science and Technology (US)
Corresponding author
  • Rownaghi, Ali A.
  • Rezaei, Fateme
Venue
Chemical Reviews
Published
2021-05-05
Volume
121
Issue
10
Pages
6246-6291
ISSN
  • 0009-2665 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6890
OpenAlex
W3159383780
Cited by
341
References
171
Citations by year
2026: 64 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 16
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemical Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Heat and Mass Transfer in Porous Media
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis
Keywords
3D printing, additive manufacturing, porous adsorbents, catalysts, structured materials, shape engineering, pressure drop, attrition, adsorption, catalysis, separation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review