Cited by 1,172Microplastics and Plastic PollutionAnalytical chemistry methods developmentEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 372 of the 372 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chemical Analysis of Microplastics and Nanoplastics: Challenges, Advanced Methods, and Perspectives

Open access
Ivleva, Natalia P.·2021·Chemical Reviews

Abstract

Microplastics and nanoplastics have become emerging particulate anthropogenic pollutants and rapidly turned into a field of growing scientific and public interest. These tiny plastic particles are found in the environment all around the globe as well as in drinking water and food, raising concerns about their impacts on the environment and human health. To adequately address these issues, reliable information on the ambient concentrations of microplastics and nanoplastics is needed. However, micro- and nanoplastic particles are extremely complex and diverse in terms of their size, shape, density, polymer type, surface properties, etc. While the particle concentrations in different media can vary by up to 10 orders of magnitude, analysis of such complex samples may resemble searching for a needle in a haystack. This highlights the critical importance of appropriate methods for the chemical identification, quantification, and characterization of microplastics and nanoplastics. The present article reviews advanced methods for the representative mass-based and particle-based analysis of microplastics, with a focus on the sensitivity and lower-size limit for detection. The advantages and limitations of the methods, and their complementarity for the comprehensive characterization of microplastics are discussed. A special attention is paid to the approaches for reliable analysis of nanoplastics. Finally, an outlook for establishing harmonized and standardized methods to analyze these challenging contaminants is presented, and perspectives within and beyond this research field are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00178

Cites

372 of 372 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 372 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Koelmans A. A., 2019, A Scientific Perspective on Microplastics in Nature and Society
  2. Arthur, C.; Baker, J.; Bamford, H. Proceedings of the Second Research Workshop on Microplastic Debris, November 5–6, 2010 ; NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS-OR&R-39; Marine Debris Division, Office of Response and Restoration, Ocean Service, NOAA, 2011; https://marinedebris.noaa.gov/proceedings-second-research-workshop-microplastic-marine-debris.
  3. 2020, ISO/TT 21960 Plastics—Environmental Aspects—State of Knowledge and Methodologies
  4. Marcott, C.; Kansiz, M.; Dillon, E.; Kjoller, K.; Weston, F.; Anderson, J. Application of Submicron Simultaneous Raman and Optical Photothermal Infrared Spectroscopy to Chemically Identify Microplastic Particles, Cultural Artifacts, and Forensic Samples. Eastern Analytical Symposium, Princeton, NJ, USA, November 19, 2020 , 2020.
  5. Valliant R., 2013, Practical Tools for Designing and Weighting Survey Samples. Statistics for Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51
  6. Ribeiro-Claro P., 2017, Comprehensive Analytical Chemistry: Characterization and Analysis of Microplastics
  7. 10.1016/j.watres.2019.06.032 · DOI
  8. 10.1007/s00216-021-03498-y · DOI · Paper page
  9. 2014, Normenausschuss Wasserwesen (NAW) Im DIN. Deutsche Einheitsverfahren Zur Wasser-, Abwasser- Und Schlammuntersuchung—Allgemeine Angaben (Gruppe a)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 1,001–1,001 of 1,001

Metadata

Authors
Ivleva, N. P.
Affiliations
Technical University of Munich (DE)
Corresponding author
Ivleva, Natalia P.
Venue
Chemical Reviews
Published
2021-08-26
Volume
121
Issue
19
Pages
11886-11936
ISSN
  • 0009-2665 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6890
OpenAlex
W3196228331
Cited by
1,172
References
372
Citations by year
2026: 333 · 2025: 316 · 2024: 245 · 2023: 177 · 2022: 92 · 2021: 8
FWCI
6.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chemical Reviews (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Bundesministerium f??r Bildung und Forschung (02WPL1443A, 03F0851B)
  • Bayerische Forschungsstiftung (AZ-1258-16)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
Keywords
microplastics, nanoplastics, compound identification, quantification, detection sensitivity, detection limit, polymer characterization, environmental pollutants, food contamination, drinking water contamination, analytical method standardization
MeSH terms
Microplastics, Environmental Pollutants, Humans, Plastics, Polymers, Water Pollutants, Chemical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review