Cited by 39Electric Vehicles and InfrastructureTransportation and Mobility InnovationsElectric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies

Private versus Shared, Automated Electric Vehicles for U.S. Personal Mobility: Energy Use, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Grid Integration, and Cost Impacts

Open access
Sheppard, Colin J. R., Jenn, Alan T., Greenblatt, Jeffery B., Bauer, Gordon S., Gerke, Brian F.·2021·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Transportation is the fastest-growing source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and energy consumption globally. While the convergence of shared mobility, vehicle automation, and electrification has the potential to drastically reduce transportation impacts, it requires careful integration with rapidly evolving electricity systems. Here, we examine these interactions using a U.S.-wide simulation framework encompassing private electric vehicles (EVs), shared automated EVs (SAEVs), charging infrastructure, controlled EV charging, and a grid economic dispatch model to simulate personal mobility exclusively using EVs. We find that private EVs with uncontrolled charging would reduce GHG emissions by 46% compared to gasoline vehicles. Private EVs with fleetwide controlled charging would achieve a 49% reduction in emissions from baseline and reduce peak charging demand by 53% from the uncontrolled scenario. We also find that an SAEV fleet 9% the size of today's active vehicle fleet can satisfy trip demand with only 2.6 million chargers (0.2 per EV). Such an SAEV fleet would achieve a 70% reduction in GHG emissions at 41% of the lifecycle cost as a private EV fleet with controlled charging. The emissions and cost advantage of SAEVs is primarily due to reduced vehicle manufacturing compared with private EVs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.est.0c06655

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sheppard, C. J. R., Jenn, A. T., Greenblatt, J. B., Bauer, G. S., & Gerke, B. F.
Affiliations
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
  • International Council on Clean Transportation (DE)
Corresponding author
Sheppard, Colin J. R.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2021-02-10
Volume
55
Issue
5
Pages
3229-3239
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W3128808352
Cited by
39
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Vehicle Technologies Program (DE-AC02-05CH11231)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
Keywords
personal mobility, greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption, charging infrastructure, grid integration, economic dispatch, life cycle cost, vehicle manufacturing, shared mobility, vehicle automation, electrification, transportation energy use
MeSH terms
Greenhouse Gases, Vehicle Emissions, Electricity, Gasoline, Motor Vehicles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review