Cited by 170Electric Vehicles and InfrastructureTransportation and Mobility InnovationsEnergy, Environment, and Transportation Policies

Contributions of shared autonomous vehicles to climate change mitigation

Jones, Erick C., Leibowicz, Benjamin D.·2019·Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.trd.2019.05.005

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LIB technologies improve energy efficiency in transportation.

    “These technologies improve energy efficiency in transportation, mitigate the impacts of intermittency in emission-free energy production technologies, and improve economic productivity [2].”
  • LIB technologies mitigate the impacts of intermittency in emission-free energy production technologies.

    “These technologies improve energy efficiency in transportation, mitigate the impacts of intermittency in emission-free energy production technologies, and improve economic productivity [2].”
  • LIB technologies improve economic productivity.

    “These technologies improve energy efficiency in transportation, mitigate the impacts of intermittency in emission-free energy production technologies, and improve economic productivity [2].”
  • Charging electric SAVs at times optimal for the energy system, when SAV services have high penetration rate (replacing VMT/VKT of private vehicles by 70%), provides greater environmental benefit than application of carbon tax.

    “They show that such a strategy, when SAV services have a high penetration rate (replacing VMT/VKT of private vehicles by 70%), provides a greater environmental benefit than the application of carbon tax.”

    From Shared autonomous vehicle services: A comprehensive review (2020) · cites this paper as Jones & Leibowicz (2019)

  • Incentivizing fleet operators to charge their SAVs during times optimal for the energy system is a more important environmental policy than implementing carbon tax.

    “They also conclude 590 that incentivizing fleet operators to charge their SAVs during those times that are optimal for the energy system is a more important environmental policy, than implementing carbon tax.”

    From Shared autonomous vehicle services: A comprehensive review (2020) · cites this paper as Jones & Leibowicz, 2019

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, E. C., & Leibowicz, B. D.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Leibowicz, Benjamin D.
Venue
Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-07
Volume
72
Pages
279-298
ISSN
1361-9209 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2946570440
Cited by
170
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
6.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Graduate Education for Minorities
  • UT Energy Institute
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
Keywords
shared autonomous vehicles, climate change mitigation, greenhouse gas emissions, vehicle miles traveled, electric vehicle adoption, energy system optimization, carbon tax, travel demand

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review