Cited by 50Energy, Environment, and Transportation PoliciesEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityVehicle emissions and performance

Greenhouse gas emission mitigation pathways for urban passenger land transport under ambitious climate targets

Milovanoff, Alexandre, Minet, Laura, Cheah, Lynette, Posen, I. Daniel, MacLean, Heather L., Balasubramanian, Rajasekhar·2021·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Urban passenger land transport is an important source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions globally, but it is challenging to mitigate these emissions as this sector interacts with many other economic sectors. We develop the Climate change constrained Urban passenger Transport Integrated Life cycle assessment (CURTAIL) model to outline mitigation pathways of urban passenger land transport that are consistent with ambitious climate targets. CURTAIL uses the transport activity of exogenously defined modal shares to simulate the associated annual vehicle stocks, sales, and life cycle GHG emissions. It estimates GHG emission budgets that are consistent with global warming below 2 and 1.5 °C above preindustrial levels and seeks mitigation strategies to remain within the budgets. We apply it to a case study of Singapore, a city-state. Meeting a 1.5 °C target requires strong commitments in the transport and electricity sectors, such as reducing the motorized passenger activity, accelerating the deployment of public transit and of electrification, and decarbonizing the power generation system. Focusing on one mitigation technology or one mode of transport alone will not be sufficient to meet the target. Our novel model could be applied to any city to provide insights relevant to the design of urban climate change mitigation targets and policies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.est.0c06671

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The carbon intensity of EV production coalesces around 140 kg CO2/kWh.

    “Multiple sources report a range of values for the carbon intensity of EV production [99,105-109]. However, they mostly have the same magnitude and coalesce around 140 kg CO2/kWh, with about 25% of emissions coming from mining to cathode production, 40% from cell production, and the remaining 35% from pack production.”
  • About 25% of EV production emissions come from mining to cathode production, 40% from cell production, and 35% from pack production.

    “Multiple sources report a range of values for the carbon intensity of EV production [99,105-109]. However, they mostly have the same magnitude and coalesce around 140 kg CO2/kWh, with about 25% of emissions coming from mining to cathode production, 40% from cell production, and the remaining 35% from pack production.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Milovanoff, A., Minet, L., Cheah, L., Posen, I. D., MacLean, H. L., & Balasubramanian, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Singapore University of Technology and Design (SG)
  • Civil & Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119077
Corresponding author
Milovanoff, Alexandre
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2021-05-21
Volume
55
Issue
12
Pages
8236-8246
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W3162142206
Cited by
50
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Toronto
  • National University of Singapore (R-302-000-236-114)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Vehicle emissions and performance
Keywords
greenhouse gas emissions reduction, urban passenger transport, life cycle assessment, modal split, vehicle stock, emission budget, 1.5°C target, 2°C target, public transport, vehicle electrification, electric mobility, Singapore
MeSH terms
Greenhouse Gases, Cities, Transportation, Greenhouse Effect, Climate Change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review