Cited by 31Algal biology and biofuel productionAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsInnovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics Systems

Real-time sensor data profile-based deep learning method applied to open raceway pond microalgal productivity prediction

Open access
Igou, Thomas, Zhong, Shifa, Reid, Elliot, Chen, Yongsheng·2023·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Microalgal biotechnology holds the potential for renewable biofuels, bioproducts, and carbon capture applications due to unparalleled photosynthetic efficiency and diversity. Outdoor open raceway pond (ORP) cultivation enables utilization of sunlight and atmospheric carbon dioxide to drive microalgal biomass synthesis for production of bioproducts including biofuels; however, environmental conditions are highly dynamic and fluctuate both diurnally and seasonally, making ORP productivity prediction challenging without time-intensive physical measurements and location-specific calibrations. Here, for the first time, we present an image-based deep learning method for the prediction of ORP productivity. Our method is based on parameter profile plot images of sensor parameters, including pH, dissolved oxygen, temperature, photosynthetically active radiation, and total dissolved solids. These parameters can be remotely monitored without physical interaction with ORPs. We apply the model to data we generated during the Unified Field Studies of the Algae Testbed Public-Private-Partnership (ATP 3 UFS), the largest publicly available ORP data set to date, which includes millions of sensor records and 598 productivities from 32 ORPs operated in 5 states in the United States. We demonstrate that this approach significantly outperforms an average value based traditional machine learning method ( R 2 = 0.77 ≫ R 2 = 0.39) without considering bioprocess parameters (e.g., biomass density, hydraulic retention time, and nutrient concentrations). We then evaluate the sensitivity of image and monitoring data resolutions and input parameter variations. Our results demonstrate ORP productivity can be effectively predicted from remote monitoring data, providing an inexpensive tool for microalgal production and operational forecasting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.est.2c07578

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Algal digital twin has progressed and expanded in tandem with AI, IoT, and big data in the algal cultivation for biomass production sector to sustain the environment.

    “Correspondingly, ADT has also progressed and expanded in tandem with AI, IoT, and BD in the ACB sector to sustain the environment [1,11 -14].”

    From Reinvigorating algal cultivation for biomass production with digital twin technology - a smart sustainable infrastructure (2024) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Methods (Data Set Description) describe more than one million sensor records from open raceway ponds, and the Results and Discussion (Implications of IBM Methodology) report a deep-learning method for predicting microalgal biomass productivity from monitoring data. These passages support the use of AI and large sensor datasets in algal cultivation, but they do not establish that algal digital twins have progressed alongside AI, IoT, and big data, or that this progression sustains the environment. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This methodology surpasses a conventional machine learning method based on average values (R2 = 0.77 >> R2 = 0.39) when bioprocess factors are considered.

    “This study provides evidence that this methodology surpasses a conventional machine learning method based on average values (R2 = 0.77 ≫ R2 = 0.39) when bioprocess factors (such as biomass density, hydraulic”

    From Reinvigorating algal cultivation for biomass production with digital twin technology - a smart sustainable infrastructure (2024) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Results and Discussion section (‘Implications of IBM Methodology’) reports that the image-based model outperformed the average-value model on test-set R² (0.7668 versus 0.3883). But it says this was achieved without providing fundamental bioprocess parameters, including biomass density and hydraulic retention time, to the model—not when those factors were considered. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Industry 5.0 incorporates human, environmental, and social factors as key returns to the decision-making process.

    “Industry 5.0 strives to incorporate human, environmental, and social factors as key returns to the decision-making process [1].”

    From Reinvigorating algal cultivation for biomass production with digital twin technology - a smart sustainable infrastructure (2024) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Results and Discussion section, under “Implications of IBM Methodology” (page unavailable), discusses microalgal productivity prediction and possible operational and environmental applications, not Industry 5.0. Searches for Industry 5.0 and for human, environmental, and social factors in decision-making found no passage addressing the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Olaizola M.; Huntley M. E. Recent Advances in Commercial Production of Astaxanthin from Microalgae. Recent Advances in Marine Biotechnology. Volume 9: Biomaterials and Bioprocessing; 2003; Vol. 9, (JANUARY),, pp 143– 164.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Igou, T., Zhong, S., Reid, E., & Chen, Y.
Affiliations
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • East China Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
Chen, Yongsheng
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2023-05-26
Volume
57
Issue
46
Pages
17981-17989
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W4378348444
Cited by
31
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Food and Agriculture (2018-68011-28371, 2020-67021-31526)
  • Biomass Program (DE-EE0005996, DE-EE0008520)
  • Division of Engineering Education and Centers (1936928)
  • Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation (2112533)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Innovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics Systems
Keywords
raceway ponds, deep learning image analysis, remote monitoring, microalgal biotechnology, biofuels, photosynthetically active radiation, dissolved oxygen, pH, total dissolved solids, operational forecasting
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Sunlight, Biomass, Biofuels, Microalgae, Ponds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review