The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
“Control-Alt-Delete”: Rebooting Solutions for the E-Waste Problem
Open accessAbstract
A number of efforts have been launched to solve the global electronic waste (e-waste) problem. The efficiency of e-waste recycling is subject to variable national legislation, technical capacity, consumer participation, and even detoxification. E-waste management activities result in procedural irregularities and risk disparities across national boundaries. We review these variables to reveal opportunities for research and policy to reduce the risks from accumulating e-waste and ineffective recycling. Full regulation and consumer participation should be controlled and reinforced to improve local e-waste system. Aiming at standardizing best practice, we alter and identify modular recycling process and infrastructure in eco-industrial parks that will be expectantly effective in countries and regions to handle the similar e-waste stream. Toxicity can be deleted through material substitution and detoxification during the life cycle of electronics. Based on the idea of "Control-Alt-Delete", four patterns of the way forward for global e-waste recycling are proposed to meet a variety of local situations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Green Chemistry: Principles and Practice
Anastas, P., & Eghbali, N. (2010) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/b918763b · Cited by 5,256
Saphores, J.-D. M., Ogunseitan, O. A., & Shapiro, A. A. (2012) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.12.003 · Cited by 392
Self-citationEnvironmental effects of information and communications technologies
Williams, E. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10682 · Cited by 304
Does WEEE recycling make sense from an environmental perspective?
Hischier, R., Wäger, P., & Gauglhofer, J. (2005) · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2005.04.003 · Cited by 301
Zhang, T., He, Y., Wang, F., Ge, L., Zhu, X., & Li, H. (2014) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2014.01.002 · Cited by 246
E-waste collection channels and household recycling behaviors in Taizhou of China
Chi, X., Wang, M. Y. L., & Reuter, M. A. (2014) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.056 · Cited by 226
Cited by
Environmental pollution of electronic waste recycling in India: A critical review
Awasthi, A. K., Zeng, X., & Li, J. (2016) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2015.11.027 · Cited by 375
Self-citationStadlober, B., Zirkl, M., & Irimia-Vladu, M. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00928g · Cited by 339
Electronic waste generation, recycling and resource recovery: Technological perspectives and trends
Rene, E. R., Sethurajan, M., Kumar Ponnusamy, V., Kumar, G., Bao Dung, T. N., Brindhadevi, K., & Pugazhendhi, A. (2021) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125664 · Cited by 322
Roadmap for a sustainable circular economy in lithium-ion and future battery technologies
Harper, G. D. J., Kendrick, E., Anderson, P. A., Mrozik, W., Christensen, P., Lambert, S., Greenwood, D., Das, P. K., Ahmeid, M., Milojevic, Z., et al. (2023) · Journal of Physics: Energy · doi:10.1088/2515-7655/acaa57 · Cited by 137
Reshaping global policies for circular economy
Zeng, X., Ogunseitan, O. A., Nakamura, S., Suh, S., Kral, U., Li, J., & Geng, Y. (2022) · Circular Economy · doi:10.1016/j.cec.2022.100003 · Cited by 107
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, J., Zeng, X., Chen, M., Ogunseitan, O. A., & Stevels, A.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-06-04
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 7095-7108
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W636493565
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 40.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
