CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 16

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Human Plastiphere: A Bioparticulate System Challenging Microplastic Risk Assessment and Governance

Shruti, V. C., Kutralam-Muniasamy, Gurusamy·2025·Environmental Science & Technology
DOI 10.1021/acs.est.5c05922PMC PMC12631990
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.est.5c05922

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

1 Sources and intake routes of MPs and their role in the human plastiphere. MPs originate from the environment, food, packaging, and textiles, and enter the body through ingestion, inhalation, and dermal contact. Inside the body, MPs contribute to a human plastipherea bioparticulate system characterized by persistence, biological interactions, and organ-specific accumulation.
1 Sources and intake routes of MPs and their role in the human plastiphere. MPs originate from the environment, food, packaging, and textiles, and enter the body through ingestion, inhalation, and dermal contact. Inside the body, MPs contribute to a human plastipherea bioparticulate system characterized by persistence, biological interactions, and organ-specific accumulation.CC BY · PubMed Central
2 Demographic and methodological characterization of human microplastic exposure studies. (a) Geographic distribution of studies reporting human microplastic detection by country. (b) Age groups assessed in human microplastic exposure studies, highlighting a predominance of adult-only samples. (c) Gender representation across all studies, showing a modest male bias. (d) Health status of studied populations, with nearly half of studies focused on individuals with underlying conditions. (e) Occupational groups included in studies, with a large proportion not reporting occupational background. (f) Distribution of study sample sizes per sampled compartment, with most studies involving fewer than 30 participants. (g) Analytical detection methods used across human tissue microplastic studies, showing frequent use of Py-GCMS and LDIR.
2 Demographic and methodological characterization of human microplastic exposure studies. (a) Geographic distribution of studies reporting human microplastic detection by country. (b) Age groups assessed in human microplastic exposure studies, highlighting a predominance of adult-only samples. (c) Gender representation across all studies, showing a modest male bias. (d) Health status of studied populations, with nearly half of studies focused on individuals with underlying conditions. (e) Occupational groups included in studies, with a large proportion not reporting occupational background. (f) Distribution of study sample sizes per sampled compartment, with most studies involving fewer than 30 participants. (g) Analytical detection methods used across human tissue microplastic studies, showing frequent use of Py-GCMS and LDIR.CC BY · PubMed Central
3 Domains of the eight plastiphere paradoxes. Node colors represent the domain of each paradoxAnalytical (blue), Biological (green), and Chronological (red)while linked boxes propose domain-specific strategies to resolve each paradox.
3 Domains of the eight plastiphere paradoxes. Node colors represent the domain of each paradoxAnalytical (blue), Biological (green), and Chronological (red)while linked boxes propose domain-specific strategies to resolve each paradox.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 180

  1. 10.1002/jat.3915 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158111 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.toxrep.2025.101955 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/s41440-024-01659-x · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105692 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.140301 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/s41443-024-00930-6 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108444 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.envres.2025.121278 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.jare.2022.09.004 · DOI
  11. 10.3390/jcm13144029 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105118 · DOI
  13. 10.1007/s10311-022-01560-4 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/jgh3.12457 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112246 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.envres.2025.121077 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175825 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176153 · DOI
  19. 10.1021/acs.est.1c03924 · DOI
  20. 10.1021/acs.est.3c11054 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.125168 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104828 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.117497 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144345 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158699 · DOI
  26. 10.3390/pharmaceutics13070921 · DOI
  27. 10.1177/11786302241235810 · DOI
  28. 10.3390/environments8120138 · DOI
  29. 10.3390/su132212840 · DOI
  30. 10.7326/M19-0618 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116818 · DOI
  32. 10.1186/s12302-022-00605-3 · DOI
  33. 10.3390/toxics11090759 · DOI
  34. 10.1021/acs.est.1c03859 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136067 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.125389 · DOI
  37. 10.1021/acs.est.3c01771 · DOI
  38. 10.1021/acs.est.3c00716 · DOI
  39. 10.1021/acs.est.2c06880 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19665 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129439 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.125054 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.136069 · DOI
  44. 10.1002/alr.23427 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.envres.2024.119498 · DOI
  46. 10.1186/s12894-024-01495-8 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105360 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.178815 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124632 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105369 · DOI
  51. 10.1007/s10311-024-01752-0 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162713 · DOI
  53. 10.1093/toxsci/kfae060 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.envadv.2024.100555 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106274 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158699 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120174 · DOI
  58. 10.3390/pharmaceutics13070921 · DOI
  59. 10.1021/acs.est.2c04706 · DOI
  60. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.117300 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171044 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2025.117868 · DOI
  63. 10.1093/humrep/deae108.1081 · DOI
  64. 10.3390/toxics11040310 · DOI
  65. 10.3390/life15030357 · DOI
  66. 10.1093/ndt/gfad063a_6111 · DOI
  67. 10.1038/s41591-024-03453-1 · DOI
  68. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170455 · DOI
  69. 10.1021/acs.est.3c11054 · DOI
  70. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116208 · DOI
  71. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.117497 · DOI
  72. 10.1016/j.envres.2024.119498 · DOI
  73. 10.1186/s43591-024-00090-w · DOI
  74. 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107199 · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108751 · DOI
  76. 10.1038/s41598-024-81931-9 · DOI
  77. 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.125054 · DOI
  78. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.133855 · DOI
  79. 10.1021/acs.est.2c07179 · DOI · Paper page
  80. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.40018 · DOI
  81. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.136028 · DOI
  82. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.133631 · DOI
  83. 10.1016/j.envint.2025.109316 · DOI
  84. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135266 · DOI
  85. 10.1002/jrs.6753 · DOI
  86. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.132640 · DOI
  87. 10.1371/journal.pone.0280594 · DOI
  88. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163576 · DOI
  89. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123799 · DOI
  90. 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112078 · DOI
  91. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171109 · DOI
  92. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.137635 · DOI
  93. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167760 · DOI
  94. 10.1186/s43591-022-00033-3 · DOI
  95. 10.1186/s12989-024-00602-9 · DOI
  96. 10.3389/fenvs.2020.572424 · DOI
  97. 10.1016/j.watres.2017.11.011 · DOI
  98. 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.12.082 · DOI
  99. 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.05.038 · DOI
  100. 10.1080/10643389.2023.2195798 · DOI
  101. 10.1021/acs.est.3c01942 · DOI
  102. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.135852 · DOI
  103. 10.1021/acsfoodscitech.3c00673 · DOI
  104. 10.1093/toxsci/kfae136 · DOI
  105. 10.1021/acs.est.4c12599 · DOI
  106. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.132359 · DOI
  107. 10.1016/j.cbi.2024.111043 · DOI
  108. 10.1016/j.fct.2022.113577 · DOI
  109. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113238 · DOI
  110. 10.1007/s43188-023-00224-x · DOI
  111. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113238 · DOI
  112. 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106061 · DOI
  113. 10.3390/biology12091243 · DOI
  114. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.051 · DOI
  115. 10.1007/s00204-019-02478-7 · DOI
  116. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164687 · DOI
  117. 10.1186/s12989-020-00358-y · DOI · Paper page
  118. 10.1038/s41598-020-64464-9 · DOI
  119. 10.1021/acs.est.7b00423 · DOI · Paper page
  120. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124004 · DOI
  121. 10.1002/tox.23618 · DOI
  122. 10.1021/acs.est.9b03191 · DOI
  123. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170962 · DOI
  124. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124028 · DOI
  125. 10.1016/j.tox.2020.152665 · DOI
  126. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123430 · DOI
  127. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126084 · DOI
  128. 10.3390/ijerph17041212 · DOI
  129. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123913 · DOI
  130. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167287 · DOI
  131. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125492 · DOI
  132. 10.1039/D4RA04544K · DOI
  133. 10.1016/j.tox.2024.153883 · DOI
  134. 10.1007/s00204-024-03875-3 · DOI
  135. 10.3390/cimb46050256 · DOI
  136. 10.1016/j.tox.2024.153951 · DOI
  137. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.137306 · DOI
  138. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176898 · DOI
  139. 10.1016/j.eehl.2024.05.007 · DOI
  140. 10.1039/D4LC00578C · DOI
  141. 10.1038/s41467-022-34422-2 · DOI
  142. 10.1021/acs.est.4c00010 · DOI
  143. 10.1021/acs.estlett.3c00147 · DOI
  144. Lusher A. Á., 2020, Analysis of Nanoplastics and Microplastics in Food, 119, 10.1201/9780429469596-8 · DOI
  145. 10.1002/etc.3608 · DOI
  146. 10.1007/s00216-020-02979-w · DOI
  147. 10.1007/s00216-023-04671-1 · DOI
  148. 10.1016/j.envint.2023.108172 · DOI
  149. 10.1016/j.reprotox.2025.108956 · DOI
  150. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.134706 · DOI
  151. 10.1039/D2EN00800A · DOI
  152. 10.3390/toxics10100586 · DOI
  153. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5c00416 · DOI
  154. 10.1371/journal.pone.0304686 · DOI
  155. 10.1186/s43591-021-00024-w · DOI
  156. 10.1038/s41598-025-96393-w · DOI
  157. 10.1016/j.coesh.2017.10.002 · DOI · Paper page
  158. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154884 · DOI
  159. 10.3390/toxics10040186 · DOI
  160. 10.1021/acs.est.5b03163 · DOI
  161. 10.3390/ani13111736 · DOI
  162. 10.1021/acs.est.9b01517 · DOI · Paper page
  163. 10.3390/ijerph20227037 · DOI
  164. 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115083 · DOI
  165. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.10.061 · DOI
  166. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b06635 · DOI · Paper page
  167. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129642 · DOI
  168. 10.3390/toxics12080555 · DOI
  169. 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113904 · DOI · Paper page
  170. 10.1016/j.fct.2021.112803 · DOI
  171. 10.1016/j.envint.2024.109026 · DOI
  172. 10.1016/j.fct.2023.113970 · DOI
  173. 10.3390/jox15030075 · DOI
  174. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104901 · DOI
  175. 10.3390/cimb46030168 · DOI
  176. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115417 · DOI
  177. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153413 · DOI
  178. 10.3390/ijerph17051509 · DOI
  179. European Commission, 2023, Off. J. Eur. Union, 239, 1
  180. Coffin, S. Status of Legislation and Regulatory Drivers for Microplastics in California. In To Protect Water Quality Around the World , Vol. 54, p 17. Horiba Technical Journal, 2020. https://ftp.sccwrp.org/pub/download/DOCUMENTS/TechnicalReports/1133_MicroplasticDrivers.pdf. Accessed 2025–09–30.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 16

Metadata

Authors
Shruti, V. C., & Kutralam-Muniasamy, G.
Affiliations
  • Lab 49, Contaminantes Emergentes, Department of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Av Instituto Politécnico Nacional 2508, San Pedro Zacatenco, Gustavo A. Madero, 07360 Ciudad de México, México
  • CIITEC - IPN, Centro de Investigación e Innovación Tecnológica, Cda. de Cecati s/n, Santa Catarina, Azcapotzalco, 02250 Ciudad de México, México
ORCID
Shruti, V. C.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2025-10-01
Volume
59
Issue
45
Pages
24131-24150
ISSN
  • 0013-936X
  • 1520-5851
DOI
10.1021/acs.est.5c05922
PMC
PMC12631990
Cited by
16
References
14
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
Funders
Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencias y Tecnolog??as (CBF-2025-I-782, CVU 351578)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review