Cited by 242Sustainability and Ecological Systems AnalysisRecycling and Waste Management TechniquesIron and Steelmaking Processes

How Will Copper Contamination Constrain Future Global Steel Recycling?

Open access
Daehn, Katrin E., Cabrera Serrenho, André, Allwood, Julian M.·2017·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Copper in steel causes metallurgical problems, but is pervasive in end-of-life scrap and cannot currently be removed commercially once in the melt. Contamination can be managed to an extent by globally trading scrap for use in tolerant applications and dilution with primary iron sources. However, the viability of long-term strategies can only be evaluated with a complete characterization of copper in the global steel system and this is presented in this paper. The copper concentration of flows along the 2008 steel supply chain is estimated from a survey of literature data and compared with estimates of the maximum concentration that can be tolerated in steel products. Estimates of final steel demand and scrap supply by sector are taken from a global stock-saturation model to determine when the amount of copper in the steel cycle will exceed that which can be tolerated. Best estimates show that quantities of copper arising from conventional scrap preparation can be managed in the global steel system until 2050 assuming perfectly coordinated trade and extensive dilution, but this strategy will become increasingly impractical. Technical and policy interventions along the supply chain are presented to close product loops before this global constraint.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.est.7b00997

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Allwood, J. The future of steel: time to wake up. Materials World 2016, 24 (1), 44-47.
  2. Savov, L.; Volkova, E.; Janke, D. Copper and tin in steel scrap recycling. Materials Geoenvironment 2003, 50 (3), 627-640.
  3. Bjorkman, B.; Samuelsson, C. Recycling of Steel. In Handbook of Recycling; Worrell, E., Reuter, M., Eds.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2013; pp 65-83.
  4. Katayama, H.; Sano, N.; Sasabe, M.; Matsuoka, S. Research Activities on Residual Element Removal Japan Iron and SteelToday, Yesterday, and Tomorrow. (Stockholm 11-14 June) Conference Proceedings. 1997, 1, 15-26.
  5. Oba, K. Wiring Harnesses for Next Generation Automobiles. Fujikura Tech Rev. 2013, 42, 77-80.
  6. Toyota. Toyota's Environmental Initiatives: Contribution to a Recycling-Based Society, 2015; pg. 32; http://www.toyota-global. com/sustainability/report/er/pdf/er15_04_en.pdf. (43) 2000/53/EC of the European Parliament and the council of 18 September 2000 on end of life vehicles; Official Journal of the European Communities; 21-10-2000; European Commission, 2000.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Daehn, K. E., Cabrera Serrenho, A., & Allwood, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of Cambridge , , ,
Corresponding author
Allwood, Julian M.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2017-04-26
Volume
51
Issue
11
Pages
6599-6606
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2607821168
Cited by
242
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4
FWCI
6.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/N02351X/1)
  • Cambridge Commonwealth, European and International Trust (NA)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Iron and Steelmaking Processes
Keywords
copper contamination, steel recycling, steel supply chain, circular economy policy
MeSH terms
Copper, Iron, Metallurgy, Steel, Recycling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review