Cited by 95Recycling and Waste Management TechniquesEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilitySustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis

Quality- and Dilution Losses in the Recycling of Ferrous Materials from End-of-Life Passenger Cars: Input-Output Analysis under Explicit Consideration of Scrap Quality

Nakamura, Shinichiro, Kondo, Yasushi, Matsubae, Kazuyo, Nakajima, Kenichi, Tasaki, Tomohiro, Nagasaka, Tetsuya·2012·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Metals can in theory be infinitely recycled in a closed-loop without any degradation in quality. In reality, however, open-loop recycling is more typical for metal scrap recovered from end-of-life (EoL) products because mixing of different metal species results in scrap quality that no longer matches the originals. Further losses occur when meeting the quality requirement of the target product requires dilution of the secondary material by adding high purity materials. Standard LCA usually does not address these losses. This paper presents a novel approach to quantifying quality- and dilution losses, by means of hybrid input-output analysis. We focus on the losses associated with the recycling of ferrous materials from end-of-life vehicle (ELV) due to the mixing of copper, a typical contaminant in steel recycling. Given the quality of scrap in terms of copper density, the model determines the ratio by which scrap needs to be diluted in an electric arc furnace (EAF), and the amount of demand for EAF steel including those quantities needed for dilution. Application to a high-resolution Japanese IO table supplemented with data on ferrous materials including different grades of scrap indicates that a nationwide avoidance of these losses could result in a significant reduction of CO(2) emissions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es3013529

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nakamura, S., Kondo, Y., Matsubae, K., Nakajima, K., Tasaki, T., & Nagasaka, T.
Affiliations
  • Waseda University (JP)
  • Tohoku University (JP)
  • National Institute for Environmental Studies (JP)
Corresponding author
Nakamura, Shinichiro
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2012-08-22
Volume
46
Issue
17
Pages
9266-9273
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2332431058
Cited by
95
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4
FWCI
9.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (22360386, 23686131, 22360387)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
Keywords
metal recycling, end-of-life vehicles, ferrous scrap, copper contamination, steel recycling, electric arc furnace steel, CO2 emission reduction, closed-loop recycling, open-loop recycling
MeSH terms
Automobiles, Copper, Ferrous Compounds, Models, Chemical, Steel, Recycling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review