Cited by 98

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reductive defluorination of branched per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances with cobalt complex catalysts

Liu, Jinyong, Van Hoomissen, Daniel J., Liu, Tianchi, Maizel, Andrew, Huo, Xiangchen, Fernández, Seth R., Ren, Changxu, Xiao, Xin, Fang, Yida, Schaefer, Charles E., Higgins, Christopher P., Vyas, Shubham, Strathmann, Timothy J.·2018·Environmental Science & Technology Letters

Abstract

This study investigates structure–reactivity relationships within branched per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) undergoing cobalt-catalyzed reductive defluorination reactions. Experimental results and theoretical calculations reveal correlations among the extent of PFAS defluorination, the local C–F bonding environment, and calculated bond dissociation energies (BDEs). In general, BDEs increase in the following order: tertiary C–F bonds < secondary C–F bonds < primary C–F bonds. A tertiary C–F bond adjacent to three fluorinated carbons (or two fluorinated carbons and one carboxyl group) has a relatively low BDE that permits an initial defluorination to occur. Both a biogenic cobalt–corrin complex (B 12 ) and an artificial cobalt–porphyrin complex (Co- PP ) are found to catalytically defluorinate multiple C–F bonds in selected PFASs. In general, Co- PP exhibits an initial rate of defluorination that is higher than that of B 12 . Neither complex induced significant defluorination in linear perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA; no tertiary C–F bond) or a perfluoroalkyl ether carboxylic acid (tertiary C–F BDEs too high). These results open new lines of research, including (1) designing branched PFASs and cobalt complexes that promote complete defluorination of PFASs in natural and engineered systems and (2) evaluating potential impacts of branched PFASs in biological systems where B 12 is present.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00122

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. 10.1007/s11783-009-0022-7 · DOI
  2. 10.1021/es022253t · DOI
  3. 10.1021/es104326w · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2005.04.026 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/0-387-21731-2_4 · DOI
  6. 10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00398 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/j.watres.2013.10.045 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/j.envint.2014.11.013 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19981109)78:4<491::AID-IJC16>3.0.CO;2-9 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02.028 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.04.024 · DOI
  12. Gomis, M. I. From emission sources to human tissues: modelling the exposure to per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances. Ph.D. Thesis, Stockholm University, Stockholm, 2017.
  13. 10.1021/es0405528 · DOI
  14. STANDARD 100 by OEKO-TEX - Limit Values and Individual Substances According to Appendices 4 & 5. Edition 02.2017; OEKO-TEX, 2017.
  15. 10.1007/s11783-009-0021-8 · DOI
  16. 10.1021/es903383a · DOI
  17. 10.1021/es5048649 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1021/es102582x · DOI
  19. 10.1021/acs.est.6b01698 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.06.087 · DOI
  21. 10.1021/ac8027273 · DOI
  22. 10.1021/es702842q · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1021/acs.est.7b03744 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1126/science.793008 · DOI
  25. 10.1063/1.464913 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.785 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1021/j100096a001 · DOI
  28. 10.1139/p80-159 · DOI
  29. 10.1021/jp810292n · DOI
  30. 10.1039/b801679h · DOI
  31. 10.1021/es00003a006 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/nature13901 · DOI
  33. 10.1007/s00253-013-4896-8 · DOI
  34. 10.1021/es5032147 · DOI
  35. 10.1021/es302188f · DOI
  36. 10.1021/ez500291g · DOI
  37. Yonetani T., 1974, J. Biol. Chem., 249, 682, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)42984-0 · DOI
  38. 10.1021/ar00091a001 · DOI
  39. 10.1021/ic000143m · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Liu, J., Van Hoomissen, D. J., Liu, T., Maizel, A., Huo, X., Fernández, S. R., Ren, C., Xiao, X., Fang, Y., Schaefer, C. E., Higgins, C. P., Vyas, S., & Strathmann, T. J.
Affiliations
  • Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, United States
  • Department of Environmental Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
  • CDM Smith, 110 Fieldcrest Avenue, No. 8, Sixth Floor, Edison, New Jersey 08837, United States
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
Published
2018-03-28
Volume
5
Issue
5
Pages
289-294
ISSN
2328-8930
Cited by
98
References
10
Language
en
Funders
  • Division of Chemistry (CHE-1709719, CHE-1710079)
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (ER-2424)
  • U.S. Department of Defense (ER-2424)
  • China Scholarship Council
  • U.S. Department of Energy (ER-2424)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review