Cited by 1Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesProtein Structure and DynamicsPhotochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

Barrel Shape and Chromophore Rigidity Predict Fluorescent-Protein Photophysics

Open access
Begg, Luke P., Mason, Madeline L., Zimmer, Marc·2026·Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The 11-stranded β-barrel of fluorescent proteins (FPs) is universally conserved, yet its quantitative geometry has not been systematically characterized. We analyzed cross-sectional barrel geometry across 908 FP crystal structures in the RCSB PDB by principal component analysis (PCA)-based axis determination and convex hull analysis of protein-atom slices at the chromophore plane; 780 structures (210–245 residues, with the chromophore-containing chain selected in FP-complex cocrystals) form the canonical analysis cohort. Barrel shape, but not size, correlates with emission wavelength: red-shifted proteins have narrower, more elliptical barrels (ρ = −0.328 for minor axis, p = 2.2 × 10–17). Fluorescence quantum yield, by contrast, is not governed by barrel size: it tracks how rigidly the barrel holds the chromophore (chromophore-to-barrel B-factor ratio, ρ = −0.49 per unique FP), together with the chromophore’s ground-state planarity (ρ = −0.42) as an independent signal of comparable strength. The planarity term is most pronounced among red fluorescent proteins, which span the widest range of ground-state twist. Principal correlations survive Benjamini–Hochberg correction and partial correlation controlling for resolution. The barrel is not a passive scaffold: it constrains chromophore rigidity and thereby shapes photophysical output. The pipeline was developed with Claude (Anthropic) via Claude Code.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jcim.6c01606

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 44 · Cited by 1

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Shimomura, 1962, J. Cell. Comp. Phys., 59, 223, 10.1002/jcp.1030590302 · DOI
  2. Stepanenko, 2008, Fluorescent proteins as biomarkers and biosensors: throwing color lights on molecular and cellular processes, Curr. Protein Pept.Sci., 9, 338, 10.2174/138920308785132668 · DOI
  3. Chalfie, 1994, Science, 263, 802, 10.1126/science.8303295 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Zimmer, 2009, Chem. Soc. Rev., 38, 2823, 10.1039/b904023d · DOI
  5. Tsien, 1998, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 67, 509, 10.1146/annurev.biochem.67.1.509 · DOI
  6. Day, 2009, Chem. Soc. Rev., 38, 2887, 10.1039/b901966a · DOI
  7. Rodriguez, 2017, Trends Biochem. Sci., 42, 111, 10.1016/j.tibs.2016.09.010 · DOI
  8. Ormö, 1996, Science, 273, 1392, 10.1126/science.273.5280.1392 · DOI
  9. Yang, 1996, Nat. Biotechnol., 14, 1246, 10.1038/nbt1096-1246 · DOI
  10. Heim, 1995, Nature, 373, 663, 10.1038/373663b0 · DOI
  11. Cubitt, 1995, Trends Biochem. Sci., 20, 448, 10.1016/S0968-0004(00)89099-4 · DOI
  12. Matz, 1999, Nat. Biotechnol., 17, 969, 10.1038/13657 · DOI
  13. Stepanenko, 2013, Beta-barrel scaffold of fluorescent proteins: folding, stability and role in chromophore formation, Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol., 302, 221, 10.1016/B978-0-12-407699-0.00004-2 · DOI
  14. Heim, 1996, Curr. Biol., 6, 178, 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00450-5 · DOI
  15. Wachter, 1998, Structure, 6, 1267, 10.1016/S0969-2126(98)00127-0 · DOI
  16. Gross, 2000, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 97, 11990, 10.1073/pnas.97.22.11990 · DOI
  17. Goedhart, 2012, Structure-guided evolution of cyan fluorescent proteins towards a quantum yield of 93%, Nat. Commun., 3, 751, 10.1038/ncomms1738 · DOI
  18. Ai, 2006, Biochem. J., 400, 531, 10.1042/BJ20060874 · DOI
  19. Davidson, 2009, Nat. Methods, 6, 713, 10.1038/nmeth1009-713 · DOI
  20. Hirano, 2022, Nat. Biotechnol., 40, 1132, 10.1038/s41587-022-01278-2 · DOI
  21. Shaner, 2005, Nat. Methods, 2, 905, 10.1038/nmeth819 · DOI
  22. Remington, 2006, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 16, 714, 10.1016/j.sbi.2006.10.001 · DOI
  23. Craggs, 2009, Chem. Soc. Rev., 38, 2865, 10.1039/b903641p · DOI
  24. Zimmer, 2002, Chem. Rev., 102, 759, 10.1021/cr010142r · DOI
  25. Li, 2012, Chem. Phys., 392, 143, 10.1016/j.chemphys.2011.11.001 · DOI
  26. Zimmer, 2014, Chem. Phys., 429, 5, 10.1016/j.chemphys.2013.11.015 · DOI
  27. Nwafor, 2021, Biochemistry, 60, 3762, 10.1021/acs.biochem.1c00587 · DOI
  28. Megley, 2009, J. Phys. Chem. B, 113, 302, 10.1021/jp806285s · DOI
  29. Ahmed, 2025, Molecular dynamics guided identification of a brighter variant of superfolder Green Fluorescent Protein with increased photobleaching resistance, Commun. Chem., 8, 174, 10.1038/s42004-025-01573-4 · DOI
  30. Lambert, 2019, Nat. Methods, 16, 277, 10.1038/s41592-019-0352-8 · DOI
  31. Hartley, 2022, PLoS One, 17, 10.1371/journal.pone.0267560 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Hayes, 2025, Science, 387, 850, 10.1126/science.ads0018 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Gelman, 2025, Nat. Methods, 22, 1868, 10.1038/s41592-025-02776-2 · DOI
  34. Schwartz, 2026, Vibe Physics: The AI Grad Student
  35. Sievers, 2011, Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega, Mol. Syst. Biol., 7, 539, 10.1038/msb.2011.75 · DOI
  36. Waterhouse, 2009, Bioinformatics, 25, 1189, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033 · DOI
  37. Barber, 1996, ACM Trans. Math. Softw., 22, 469, 10.1145/235815.235821 · DOI
  38. Cranfill, 2016, Nat. Methods, 13, 557, 10.1038/nmeth.3891 · DOI
  39. Virtanen, 2020, Nat. Methods, 17, 261, 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Pedregosa, 2011, Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 12, 2825
  41. Zimmer, 2026, Ground-State Chromophore Geometry, Not Cage Size, Tracks Quantum Yield, ChemRxiv
  42. Pieri, 2024, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 146, 17646, 10.1021/jacs.4c00458 · DOI
  43. Chen, 2025, A twisted chromophore powers a turn-on fluorescent protein chloride sensor, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 122, 10.1073/pnas.2508094122 · DOI
  44. Meech, 2009, Chem. Soc. Rev., 38, 2922, 10.1039/b820168b · DOI
  45. Jones, 2022, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 144, 12732, 10.1021/jacs.2c02946 · DOI
  46. Park, 2016, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 138, 13619, 10.1021/jacs.6b06833 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Begg, L. P., Mason, M. L., & Zimmer, M.
Affiliations
Connecticut College (US)
Corresponding author
Zimmer, Marc
Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2026-08-06
Volume
66
Issue
16
Pages
10266-10276
ISSN
  • 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-960X
OpenAlex
W7196943310
Cited by
1
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
2.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Digital Commons @ Connecticut College (Connecticut College) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
Keywords
fluorescent proteins, fluorescence quantum yield, emission wavelength, protein crystal structure
MeSH terms
Luminescent Proteins, Models, Molecular, Principal Component Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Barrel Shape and Chromophore Rigidity Predict Fluorescent-Protein Photophysics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.jcim.6c01606
The paper
Begg, L. P., Mason, M. L., & Zimmer, M. (2026). Barrel Shape and Chromophore Rigidity Predict Fluorescent-Protein Photophysics. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.6c01606