Cited by 263Computational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in Materials ScienceMachine Learning in Healthcare

Is Multitask Deep Learning Practical for Pharma?

Ramsundar, Bharath, Liu, Bowen, Wu, Zhenqin, Verras, Andreas, Tudor, Matthew, Sheridan, Robert P., Pande, Vijay·2017·Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Abstract

Multitask deep learning has emerged as a powerful tool for computational drug discovery. However, despite a number of preliminary studies, multitask deep networks have yet to be widely deployed in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries. This lack of acceptance stems from both software difficulties and lack of understanding of the robustness of multitask deep networks. Our work aims to resolve both of these barriers to adoption. We introduce a high-quality open-source implementation of multitask deep networks as part of the DeepChem open-source platform. Our implementation enables simple python scripts to construct, fit, and evaluate sophisticated deep models. We use our implementation to analyze the performance of multitask deep networks and related deep models on four collections of pharmaceutical data (three of which have not previously been analyzed in the literature). We split these data sets into train/valid/test using time and neighbor splits to test multitask deep learning performance under challenging conditions. Our results demonstrate that multitask deep networks are surprisingly robust and can offer strong improvement over random forests. Our analysis and open-source implementation in DeepChem provide an argument that multitask deep networks are ready for widespread use in commercial drug discovery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00146

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DNNs can model more than one activity at a time (multi-task models).

    “They can straightforwardly model more than one activity at a time (multi-task models);68”

    From QSAR without borders (2020) · cites this paper as [68]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ramsundar, B., Liu, B., Wu, Z., Verras, A., Tudor, M., Sheridan, R. P., & Pande, V.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Pande, Vijay
Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2017-08-01
Volume
57
Issue
8
Pages
2068-2076
ISSN
  • 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-960X
OpenAlex
W2734982589
Cited by
263
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 5
FWCI
21.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U19 AI109662)
  • Hertz Foundation
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01 GM062868)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
multi-task deep learning, computational drug discovery, DeepChem, open source software, model robustness, pharmaceutical data
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Software, Ultraviolet Rays, Serine Proteinase Inhibitors, Inhibitory Concentration 50, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Drug Discovery, Absorption, Radiation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review