Cited by 207Pharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismComputational Drug Discovery MethodsGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Deep learning in pharmacogenomics: from gene regulation to patient stratification

Open access
Kalinin, Alexandr A, Higgins, Gerald A, Reamaroon, Narathip, Soroushmehr, Sayedmohammadreza, Allyn-Feuer, Ari, Dinov, Ivo D, Najarian, Kayvan, Athey, Brian D·2018·Pharmacogenomics

Abstract

This Perspective provides examples of current and future applications of deep learning in pharmacogenomics, including: identification of novel regulatory variants located in noncoding domains of the genome and their function as applied to pharmacoepigenomics; patient stratification from medical records; and the mechanistic prediction of drug response, targets and their interactions. Deep learning encapsulates a family of machine learning algorithms that has transformed many important subfields of artificial intelligence over the last decade, and has demonstrated breakthrough performance improvements on a wide range of tasks in biomedicine. We anticipate that in the future, deep learning will be widely used to predict personalized drug response and optimize medication selection and dosing, using knowledge extracted from large and complex molecular, epidemiological, clinical and demographic datasets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2217/pgs-2018-0008

Cites

130 of 130 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [22]22. Kalinin AA, Palanimalai S, Dinov ID. SOCRAT Platform Design: A Web Architecture for Interactive Visual Analytics Applications. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Human-Inthe-Loop Data Analytics , ACM New York, NY, USA, 1-6 (2017).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kalinin, A. A., Higgins, G. A., Reamaroon, N., Soroushmehr, S., Allyn-Feuer, A., Dinov, I. D., Najarian, K., & Athey, B. D.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Athey, Brian D
Venue
Pharmacogenomics
Published
2018-04-26
Volume
19
Issue
7
Pages
629-650
ISSN
  • 1462-2416 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-8042
OpenAlex
W2784341656
Cited by
207
References
120
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pharmacogenomics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (P20 NR015331, U54 EB020406, P50 NS091856, P30 DK089503, P30 AG053760, T32 GM070449)
  • National Science Foundation (1734853, 1636840, 1416953, 0716055, 1023115)
  • Elsie Andresen Fiske Research Fund
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
deep learning, gene expression regulation, regulatory variants, non-coding genome, pharmacoepigenomics, patient stratification, electronic health records, drug response prediction, drug-target interactions
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Algorithms, Humans, Pharmacogenetics, Neural Networks, Computer, Models, Educational, Databases as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review