Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 246

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Brief Review on Solid Electrolyte Interphase Composition Characterization Technology for Lithium Metal Batteries: Challenges and Perspectives

Shan, Xinyi, Zhong, Yu, Zhang, Lingjie, Zhang, Yongqi, Xia, Xinhui, Wang, Xiuli, Tu, Jiangping·2021·The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Abstract

Lithium metal batteries (LMB) are recognized as the most promising high-energy-density energy storage devices. However, its large-scale commercial applications are seriously hampered by the poor cycling stability and potential safety issues. Solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) acts a dominant role in influencing the regulation of Li deposition and overall performance of LMBs, but the composition as well as the evolution of SEI remain quite elusive. Advanced characterization methods and operando monitoring techniques are urgently required. Herein, in this perspective, we first briefly introduce the development history of SEI research and the SEI formation mechanisms as well as the common known components of SEI. Then, we focus on several recent advanced technologies for SEI characterization and monitoring, and the corresponding study cases will be presented. In the end, perspectives including the future investigation directions, the in situ characterization methods, and the component-performance associated model are proposed. We believe that this timely review will help to give a comprehensive understanding on the up-to-date SEI characterization tools.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c06277

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 246

Metadata

Authors
Shan, X., Zhong, Y., Zhang, L., Zhang, Y., Xia, X., Wang, X., & Tu, J.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Published
2021-08-30
Volume
125
Issue
35
Pages
19060-19080
ISSN
  • 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-7455
OpenAlex
W3196858657
Cited by
246
References
7
FWCI
13.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.