The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spin–Orbit Charge-Transfer Intersystem Crossing (SOCT-ISC) in Bodipy-Phenoxazine Dyads: Effect of Chromophore Orientation and Conformation Restriction on the Photophysical Properties
Abstract
The spin–orbit charge-transfer-induced intersystem crossing (SOCT-ISC) in Bodipy-phenoxazine (BDP-PXZ) compact electron-donor/-acceptor dyads was studied. PXZ is the electron donor, and BDP is the electron acceptor. The molecular geometry is varied by applying different steric hindrance on the rotation about the linker between the two subunits. Charge-transfer (CT) absorption bands were observed for the dyads with more coplanar geometry (electronic coupling matrix elements is up to 2580 cm –1 ). Ultrafast charge separation (0.4 ps) and slow charge recombination (3.8 ns, i.e., SOCT-ISC process) were observed. Efficient ISC (Φ T = 54%) and long triplet-state lifetime (τ T = 539 μs) were observed for the dyads. Notably, the triplet-state lifetime is 2-fold of that accessed with heavy-atom effect, indicating the advantage of using a heavy-atom-free photosensitizer. The low-lying CT state in the dyads in polar solvents was confirmed with intermolecular triplet photosensitizing method. Time-resolved electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy show that the electron spin polarization of the triplet state formed by the SOCT-ISC is the same as that of spin–orbit-ISC (SO-ISC). 3 CT and localized excited triplet states ( 3 LE) were simultaneously observed for one of the dyads, which is rare. Normally, the CT state was observed as spin-correlated radical pair. The dyads were used as triplet photosensitizers for triplet–triplet annihilation upconversion, the quantum yield is up to 12.3%. A large anti-Stokes shift (5905 cm –1 ) was achieved by excitation into the CT absorption band, not the conventional LE absorption band.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Grabowski, Z. R., Rotkiewicz, K., & Rettig, W. (2003) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr940745l · Cited by 3,714
BODIPY dyes in photodynamic therapy
Kamkaew, A., Lim, S. H., Lee, H. B., Kiew, L. V., Chung, L. Y., & Burgess, K. (2013) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c2cs35216h · Cited by 2,104
Cited by
Wang, C., Chi, W., Qiao, Q., Tan, D., Xu, Z., & Liu, X. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d1cs00239b · Cited by 710
BODIPY‐Based Photodynamic Agents for Exclusively Generating Superoxide Radical over Singlet Oxygen
Teng, K., Chen, W., Niu, L., Fang, W., Cui, G., & Yang, Q. (2021) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202106748 · Cited by 445
Dynamics of Excitons in Conjugated Molecules and Organic Semiconductor Systems
Dimitriev, O. P. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00648 · Cited by 267
Manipulating the Dynamics of Dark Excited States in Organic Materials for Phototheranostics
Hu, W., Prasad, P. N., & Huang, W. (2021) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00688 · Cited by 141
Metadata
- Authors
- Dong, Y., Sukhanov, A. A., Zhao, J., Elmali, A., Li, X., Dick, B., Karatay, A., & Voronkova, V. K.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2019-08-27
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 37
- Pages
- 22793-22811
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2970746428
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.