Cited by 39Computational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in Materials ScienceMachine Learning in Healthcare

MEDICASCY: A Machine Learning Approach for Predicting Small-Molecule Drug Side Effects, Indications, Efficacy, and Modes of Action

Open access
Zhou, Hongyi, Cao, Hongnan, Matyunina, Lilya, Shelby, Madelyn, Cassels, Lauren, McDonald, John F., Skolnick, Jeffrey·2020·Molecular Pharmaceutics

Abstract

To improve the drug discovery yield, a method which is implemented at the beginning of drug discovery that accurately predicts drug side effects, indications, efficacy, and mode of action based solely on the input of the drug's chemical structure is needed. In contrast, extant predictive methods do not comprehensively address these aspects of drug discovery and rely on features derived from extensive, often unavailable experimental information for novel molecules. To address these issues, we developed MEDICASCY, a multilabel-based boosted random forest machine learning method that only requires the small molecule's chemical structure for the drug side effect, indication, efficacy, and probable mode of action target predictions; however, it has comparable or even significantly better performance than existing approaches requiring far more information. In retrospective benchmarking on high confidence predictions, MEDICASCY shows about 78% precision and recall for predicting at least one severe side effect and 72% precision drug efficacy. Experimental validation of MEDICASCY's efficacy predictions on novel molecules shows close to 80% precision for the inhibition of growth in ovarian, breast, and prostate cancer cell lines. Thus, MEDICASCY should improve the success rate for new drug approval. A web service for academic users is available at http://pwp.gatech.edu/cssb/MEDICASCY.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.9b01248

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [25]Zhou H; Gao M; Skolnick J, Comprehensive prediction of drug-protein interactions and side effects for the human proteome. Nature Scientific Reports 2015, 5, 11090. PMC4603786 26057345

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, H., Cao, H., Matyunina, L., Shelby, M., Cassels, L., McDonald, J. F., & Skolnick, J.
Affiliations
Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Skolnick, Jeffrey
Venue
Molecular Pharmaceutics
Published
2020-04-02
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
1558-1574
ISSN
  • 1543-8384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-8392
OpenAlex
W3014239097
Cited by
39
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Pharmaceutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (1R35GM-118039)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
drug side effect prediction, drug indications, drug efficacy prediction, small molecule drugs, multi-label classification, drug discovery, web services
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Humans, Retrospective Studies, Benchmarking, Cell Line, Tumor, Drug Discovery, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review