Cited by 929Biomedical Text Mining and OntologiesSemantic Web and OntologiesBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Disease Ontology: a backbone for disease semantic integration

Open access
Schriml, L. M., Arze, C., Nadendla, S., Chang, Y.-W. W., Mazaitis, M., Felix, V., Feng, G., Kibbe, W. A.·2012·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

The Disease Ontology (DO) database (http://disease-ontology.org) represents a comprehensive knowledge base of 8043 inherited, developmental and acquired human diseases (DO version 3, revision 2510). The DO web browser has been designed for speed, efficiency and robustness through the use of a graph database. Full-text contextual searching functionality using Lucene allows the querying of name, synonym, definition, DOID and cross-reference (xrefs) with complex Boolean search strings. The DO semantically integrates disease and medical vocabularies through extensive cross mapping and integration of MeSH, ICD, NCI's thesaurus, SNOMED CT and OMIM disease-specific terms and identifiers. The DO is utilized for disease annotation by major biomedical databases (e.g. Array Express, NIF, IEDB), as a standard representation of human disease in biomedical ontologies (e.g. IDO, Cell line ontology, NIFSTD ontology, Experimental Factor Ontology, Influenza Ontology), and as an ontological cross mappings resource between DO, MeSH and OMIM (e.g. GeneWiki). The DO project (http://diseaseontology.sf.net) has been incorporated into open source tools (e.g. Gene Answers, FunDO) to connect gene and disease biomedical data through the lens of human disease. The next iteration of the DO web browser will integrate DO's extended relations and logical definition representation along with these biomedical resource cross-mappings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkr972

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Disease Ontology data were further extended and newer ontologies such as Rat Disease Ontology and Mammalian Phenotype Ontology were added to facilitate comparison of target-disease and target-phenotype associations across multiple species.

    “The Disease Ontology (DO) (8) data were further extended and newer ontologies such as Rat Disease Ontology (9) and Mammalian Phenotype Ontology (10) were added to facilitate comparison of target-disease and target-phenotype associations across multiple species.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schriml, L. M., Arze, C., Nadendla, S., Chang, Y.-W. W., Mazaitis, M., Felix, V., Feng, G., & Kibbe, W. A.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Schriml, L. M.
  • Kibbe, W. A.
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2011-11-12
Volume
40
Issue
D1
Pages
D940-D946
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W2159092541
Cited by
929
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 94 · 2017: 92 · 2016: 67 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 13
FWCI
15.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Center for Research Resources (R01RR025342, UL1RR025741)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
disease ontology, graph databases, full-text search, mesh, ICD, SNOMED CT, OMIM, disease annotation, biomedical ontologies
MeSH terms
Computer Graphics, Disease, Humans, Terminology as Topic, Semantics, Software, User-Computer Interface, Databases, Factual, Vocabulary, Controlled

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review