Cited by 34

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Transcytosis-Triggering Nanoparticles for Overcoming Stromal Barriers and Reversing Immunosuppression in Pancreatic Cancer Combinatorial Therapy

Zhang, Shilin, You, Haoyu, Fan, Hongrui, Chen, Yun, Song, Haolin, Zhao, Zhenhao, Chen, Qinjun, Wang, Yu, Tian, Zonghua, Wu, Yuxing, Zhou, Zheng, Guo, Yun, Su, Boyu, Li, Xuwen, Jia, Ru, Fang, Mingzhu, Jiang, Chen, Sun, Tao·2025·Nano Letters

Abstract

In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), stromal cells and matrix proteins form a dense physical barrier that, while preventing the outward spread of tumor cells, also limits the penetration of drugs and CD8 + T cells inward. Additionally, the overactivated TGF-β/SMAD signaling pathway further promotes matrix proliferation and immune suppression. Therefore, crossing the stromal barrier while preserving the integrity of the stroma, releasing drugs intratumorally, remodeling the stroma, and activating the immune system is a promising drug delivery strategy. In this work, a type of enamine N -oxides modified nanoparticle was prepared, with stearic acid-modified gemcitabine prodrug (GemC18) and p SMAD2/3 inhibitor galunisertib encapsulated. The peripheral enamine N -oxides can trigger transcytosis and then respond to hypoxia and acidic microenvironments, turning the surface charge of the nanoparticles to a positive charge and enhancing penetration. The released galunisertib inhibits the TGF-β/SMAD signaling pathway, reshapes the matrix, activates antitumor immunity, and combines with gemcitabine (Gem) to kill tumor cells.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c06372

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30974-0 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/s41575-021-00457-x · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.02.012 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.semcancer.2022.03.022 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.addr.2022.114357 · DOI
  6. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aan0026 · DOI
  7. 10.1056/NEJMoa1304369 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b00374 · DOI
  9. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.50756 · DOI
  10. 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.5742 · DOI
  11. 10.1002/smll.202303668 · DOI
  12. 10.1021/acsnano.3c06544 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/smll.202304693 · DOI
  14. 10.1021/jacs.2c10188 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/s41551-021-00701-4 · DOI
  16. 10.1021/acsnano.3c06019 · DOI
  17. 10.1021/jacs.3c08012 · DOI
  18. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c00254 · DOI
  19. 10.1002/smll.202306338 · DOI
  20. 10.1186/s13014-019-1345-6 · DOI
  21. 10.1186/s13045-017-0448-5 · DOI
  22. 10.1186/s12951-022-01382-0 · DOI
  23. 10.21037/atm.2019.09.164 · DOI
  24. 10.3390/cancers12123770 · DOI
  25. 10.1097/00006676-200410000-00002 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1016/S0016-5085(98)70209-4 · DOI
  27. 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.01.031 · DOI
  28. 10.1073/pnas.2119168119 · DOI
  29. 10.1038/s41392-021-00544-0 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1038/bjc.2012.569 · DOI
  31. 10.3390/cancers13174319 · DOI
  32. 10.1126/science.1104819 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1083/jcb.201804161 · DOI
  34. 10.1002/anie.202303829 · DOI
  35. 10.1371/journal.pone.0185085 · DOI
  36. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-1457 · DOI
  37. 10.1186/s13046-020-01765-x · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.08.021 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.08.011 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.4049/jimmunol.1202702 · DOI
  41. 10.1038/s41586-020-03045-2 · DOI
  42. 10.1155/2023/6891636 · DOI
  43. 10.1186/s40425-019-0556-6 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.bpj.2020.10.020 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.03.024 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1136/jitc-2023-008405 · DOI
  47. 10.1084/jem.20030152 · DOI
  48. 10.1038/s41467-020-15404-8 · DOI
  49. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-3511 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1021/acscentsci.0c01586 · DOI
  51. 10.1038/s41427-021-00320-0 · DOI
  52. 10.1021/acsnano.5b03184 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1039/D0TB02848G · DOI
  54. 10.1038/ncomms9218 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 34

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, S., You, H., Fan, H., Chen, Y., Song, H., Zhao, Z., Chen, Q., Wang, Y., Tian, Z., Wu, Y., Zhou, Z., Guo, Y., Su, B., Li, X., Jia, R., Fang, M., Jiang, C., & Sun, T.
Venue
Nano Letters
Published
2025-02-06
Volume
25
Issue
7
Pages
2949-2959
ISSN
  • 1530-6984
  • 1530-6992
Cited by
34
References
5
Language
en
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai Municipality (22ZR1414100)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (82361148716, 82473853)
  • Science and Technology Innovation Plan Of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission (2018SHZDZX01, 24430710700)
  • ZJLab

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review