Cited by 520CO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionAdvanced Photocatalysis Techniques

Incorporation of Nitrogen Defects for Efficient Reduction of CO2 via Two-Electron Pathway on Three-Dimensional Graphene Foam

Wu, Jingjie, Liu, Mingjie, Sharma, Pranav P., Yadav, Ram Manohar, Ma, Lulu, Yang, Yingchao, Zou, Xiaolong, Zhou, Xiao-Dong +4 more·2016·Nano Letters

Abstract

The practical recycling of carbon dioxide (CO2) by the electrochemical reduction route requires an active, stable, and affordable catalyst system. Although noble metals such as gold and silver have been demonstrated to reduce CO2 into carbon monoxide (CO) efficiently, they suffer from poor durability and scarcity. Here we report three-dimensional (3D) graphene foam incorporated with nitrogen defects as a metal-free catalyst for CO2 reduction. The nitrogen-doped 3D graphene foam requires negligible onset overpotential (-0.19 V) for CO formation, and it exhibits superior activity over Au and Ag, achieving similar maximum Faradaic efficiency for CO production (∼85%) at a lower overpotential (-0.47 V) and better stability for at least 5 h. The dependence of catalytic activity on N-defect structures is unraveled by systematic experimental investigations. Indeed, the density functional theory calculations confirm pyridinic N as the most active site for CO2 reduction, consistent with experimental results.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04123

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, J., Liu, M., Sharma, P. P., Yadav, R. M., Ma, L., Yang, Y., Zou, X., Zhou, X.-D., Vajtai, R., Yakobson, B. I., Lou, J., & Ajayan, P. M.
Affiliations
  • Rice University (US)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • Department of Materials Science and NanoEngineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, United States
Corresponding author
  • Yakobson, Boris I.
  • Lou, Jun
  • Ajayan, Pulickel M.
Venue
Nano Letters
Published
2015-12-11
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
466-470
ISSN
  • 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6992
OpenAlex
W2199531033
Cited by
520
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 13
FWCI
10.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nano Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Welch Foundation (C-1716)
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-12-1-0035)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
Keywords
CO2 reduction, electrochemical CO2 reduction, nitrogen defects, metal-free catalysts, two-electron pathway, carbon monoxide production, pyridinic nitrogen, Faradaic efficiency, catalyst stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review