Cited by 83Treatment of Major DepressionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchChemical synthesis and pharmacological studies

Synthesis and N-Methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) Receptor Activity of Ketamine Metabolites

Open access
Morris, Patrick J., Moaddel, Ruin, Zanos, Panos, Moore, Curtis E., Gould, Todd, Zarate, Carlos A., Thomas, Craig J.·2017·Organic Letters

Abstract

Ketamine is rapidly metabolized in the human body to a variety of metabolites, including the hydroxynorketamines. At least two hydroxynorketamines have significant antidepressant action in rodent models, with limited action against the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor. The synthesis of 12 hydroxynorketamines and their binding affinity to the NMDA receptor is presented here.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b02177

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • (2R,6R)-HNK has binding affinity Ki and IC50 greater than 100 μM with 24% inhibition at 100 μM, and fails to impact NMDA-evoked currents in CA1 interneurons.

    “(2R,6R)-HNK has a binding affinity (Ki) and IC50 greater than 100 μM with 24% inhibition at 100 μM, and fails to impact NMDA-evoked currents in CA1 interneurons (Moaddel et al., 2013; Morris et al., 2017; Zanos et al., 2016).”

    From Mechanisms of ketamine and its metabolites as antidepressants (2022) · cites this paper as Morris et al., 2017

    The NMDA-receptor assay discussion (section labeled Abstract; page unavailable) reports that (2R,6R)-HNK produced 24% inhibition at 100 μM. Our copy does not state the claimed Ki and IC50 values for this compound or report an experiment on NMDA-evoked currents in CA1 interneurons. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • (2R,6R)-HNK does not displace MK-801 binding to NMDARs at 10 μM.

    “its inability to displace MK-801 binding to NMDARs (10 μM).”

    From Mechanisms of ketamine and its metabolites as antidepressants (2022) · cites this paper as Morris et al., 2017

    The paper’s NMDA-receptor activity discussion reports that (2R,6R)-HNK showed only 24% inhibition of MK-801-site binding at 100 μM, consistent with little activity at clinically relevant concentrations. It does not report the claimed result at 10 μM, so the specific concentration is not verified by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • (S)-ketamine has approximately 4-fold greater affinity/potency at inhibiting NMDAR compared to (R)-ketamine.

    “(S)-ketamine has ~4-fold greater affinity/potency at inhibiting the NMDAR compared to its (R)-ketamine enantiomer 13, 111–115.”

    From Mechanisms of ketamine action as an antidepressant (2018) · cites this paper as [111]

  • [3H]-MK-801 binding displacement studies showed affinity of (2R,6R)-HNK to displace MK-801 from NMDAR is >100 μM, and that of (2S,6S)-HNK is 7-20 μM.

    “[3H]-MK-801 binding displacement studies showed that the affinity of (2R,6R)-HNK to displace MK-801 from the NMDAR is >100 μM, and that of (2S,6S)-HNK is 7–20 μM 111, 112.”

    From Mechanisms of ketamine action as an antidepressant (2018) · cites this paper as [111]

  • At relevant concentrations (10 mg/kg or brain Cmax = ~10 μmol/kg in mice), (2R,6R)-HNK does not appear to inhibit the NMDAR.

    “Important for the mechanism of action of (2R,6R)-HNK as an antidepressant (and thus ketamine’s action) is the fact that at relevant concentrations (i.e., 10 mg/kg or brain Cmax = ~10 μmol/kg in mice), (2R,6R)-HNK does not appear to inhibit the NMDAR.”

    From Mechanisms of ketamine action as an antidepressant (2018) · cites this paper as [111]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morris, P. J., Moaddel, R., Zanos, P., Moore, C. E., Gould, T., Zarate, C. A., & Thomas, C. J.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Morris, Patrick J.
Venue
Organic Letters
Published
2017-08-22
Volume
19
Issue
17
Pages
4572-4575
ISSN
  • 1523-7052 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-7060
OpenAlex
W2749684885
Cited by
83
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 1
FWCI
5.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Organic Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical synthesis and pharmacological studies
Keywords
ketamine metabolites, hydroxynorketamine, NMDA receptor, antidepressant effects
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Ketamine, Molecular Structure, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, N-Methylaspartate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review