Cited by 134Treatment of Major DepressionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchTryptophan and brain disorders

Molecular Pharmacology and Neurobiology of Rapid-Acting Antidepressants

Open access
Gould, Todd D., Zarate, Carlos A., Thompson, Scott M.·2019·Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology

Abstract

For decades, symptoms of depression have been treated primarily with medications that directly target the monoaminergic brain systems, which typically take weeks to exert measurable effects and months to exert remission of symptoms. Low, subanesthetic doses of ( R,S)-ketamine (ketamine) result in the rapid improvement of core depressive symptoms, including mood, anhedonia, and suicidal ideation, occurring within hours following a single administration, with relief from symptoms typically lasting up to a week. The discovery of these actions of ketamine has resulted in a reconceptualization of how depression could be more effectively treated in the future. In this review, we discuss clinical data pertaining to ketamine and other rapid-acting antidepressant drugs, as well as the current state of pharmacological knowledge regarding their mechanism of action. Additionally, we discuss the neurobiological circuits that are engaged by this drug class and that may be targeted by a future generation of medications, for example, hydroxynorketamine; metabotropic glutamate receptor 2/3 antagonists; and N-methyl-d-aspartate, α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid, and γ-aminobutyric acid receptor modulators.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010617-052811

Cites

163 of 163 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence that PCP, MK-801, and memantine produce antidepressant-like effects in rodents is mixed, and clinical studies are failing or lacking.

    “Given that the evidence of PCP, MK-801, and memantine exerting antidepressant-like effects in rodents is mixed, with clinical studies either failing or lacking”

    From Mechanisms of ketamine and its metabolites as antidepressants (2022) · cites this paper as Gould et al., 2019

    The Pharmacology section says NMDAR channel blockers such as MK-801 typically have not shown ketamine’s sustained antidepressant effects in preclinical models, and the Clinical Studies section reports that memantine failed in multiple placebo-controlled MDD trials. The copy does not establish mixed rodent findings for all three named drugs or state that clinical studies of PCP and MK-801 are lacking; its reference to phencyclidine concerns NMDAR activity, not antidepressant effects. Page numbers were not provided. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Stronger excitatory neurotransmission, especially via AMPARs, appears to be a shared requirement for antidepressant efficacy across classical and rapid-acting drugs.

    “It appears that increased strength of excitatory neurotransmission, in particular involving AMPARs, represents a common downstream target that is necessary for antidepressant efficacy among classical and rapid-acting antidepressants (Alt et al., 2006; Gould et al., 2019; Thompson et al., 2015).”

    From Mechanisms of ketamine and its metabolites as antidepressants (2022) · cites this paper as Gould et al., 2019

    The 'Antidepressant Expression Mechanisms' section says AMPARs are required for rapid antidepressant actions and links sustained effects to stronger synapses. But 'Future Medication Development for the Rapid Treatment of Depression' says classical monoamine-acting antidepressants appear insensitive to acute AMPAR blockade. The paper therefore does not support an AMPAR requirement shared across classical and rapid-acting drugs; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • NMDAR antagonism may not fully account for ketamine's antidepressant effects.

    “NMDAR antagonism may not fully explain the antidepressant effects of ketamine”

    From Mechanisms of ketamine and its metabolites as antidepressants (2022) · cites this paper as Gould et al., 2019

  • Animal work suggests ketamine's benefits involve both BDNF-TrkB signaling and the brain's own synaptic strengthening processes.

    “Preclinical studies suggest that the beneficial actions of ketamine are mediated by activation of both BDNF-TrkB signaling and endogenous synaptic strengthening mechanisms [114].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [22]Newport DJ, Carpenter LL, McDonald WM, Potash JB, Tohen M, 2015 Ketamine and other NMDA antagonists: early clinical trials and possible mechanisms in depression. Am. J. Psychiatry 172: 950– 66 26423481
  2. [47]Cerecor. 2016 Cerecor reports top-line data from CERC-301 phase 2 study for major depressive disorder Press Release, Nov. 29. https://ir.cerecor.com/press-releases/detail/30/cerecor-reports-top-line-data-from-cerc-301-phase-2-study
  3. [48]Paterson B, Fraser H, Wang C, Marcus R. 2015 A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, sequential parallel study of CERC-301 in the adjunctive treatment of subjects with severe depression and recent active suicidal ideation despite antidepressant treatment Poster presented at National Network of Depression Centers Annual Conference, Ann Arbor, MI,
  4. [100]Zanos P, Moaddel R, Morris PJ, Georgiou P, Fischell J, 2017 Reply to: Effects of a ketamine metabolite on synaptic NMDAR function. Nature 546: E4– 5 28640258

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gould, T. D., Zarate, C. A., & Thompson, S. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Gould, Todd D.
Venue
Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Published
2019-01-06
Volume
59
Issue
1
Pages
213-236
ISSN
  • 0362-1642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4304
OpenAlex
W2897395578
Cited by
133
References
163
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 3
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH086828, R01MH107615, ZIAMH002857)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
Keywords
rapid-acting antidepressants, ketamine, depression, mechanism of action, hydroxynorketamine, NMDA receptor modulators, anhedonia, suicidal ideation
MeSH terms
Animals, Antidepressive Agents, Brain, Depression, Humans, Ketamine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review