The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CO2 Electroreduction at Low Overpotential on Oxide-Derived Cu/Carbons Fabricated from Metal Organic Framework
Abstract
Electrochemical reduction of CO 2 to chemical feedstocks is an attractive solution that prevents CO 2 accumulation in the atmosphere, but it remains a great challenge to develop the cost-effective catalysts. Herein, we synthesized oxide-derived Cu/carbon (OD Cu/C) catalysts by a facile carbonization of Cu-based MOF (HKUST-1). The resulting materials exhibited highly selective CO 2 reduction to alcohol compounds with total faradic efficiencies of 45.2–71.2% at −0.1 to −0.7 V versus reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE). High-yield methanol and ethanol has been achieved on OD Cu/C-1000 with the production rates of 5.1–12.4 and 3.7–13.4 mg L –1 h –1, respectively. Notably, the onset potential for C 2 H 5 OH formation is near −0.1 V (versus RHE), corresponding to ∼190 mV of overpotential, which is among the lowest overpotentials reported to date for the reduction of CO 2 to C 2 H 5 OH. The improvements in activity and selectivity of the oxide-derived Cu/carbon might be attributed to the synergistic effect between the highly dispersed copper and the matrix of porous carbon. These findings provide a new insight into design of practical catalysts for decreasing atmospheric CO 2 levels and synthesizing liquid fuels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
How copper catalyzes the electroreduction of carbon dioxide into hydrocarbon fuels
Peterson, A. A., Abild-Pedersen, F., Studt, F., Rossmeisl, J., & Nørskov, J. K. (2010) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c0ee00071j · Cited by 3,784
New insights into the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide on metallic copper surfaces
Kuhl, K. P., Cave, E. R., Abram, D. N., & Jaramillo, T. F. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee21234j · Cited by 3,160
A review of catalysts for the electroreduction of carbon dioxide to produce low-carbon fuels
Qiao, J., Liu, Y., Hong, F., & Zhang, J. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c3cs60323g · Cited by 2,990
Self-citationJin, H., Wang, J., Su, D., Wei, Z., Pang, Z., & Wang, Y. (2015) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja5127165 · Cited by 1,765
Electroreduction of carbon monoxide to liquid fuel on oxide-derived nanocrystalline copper
Li, C. W., Ciston, J., & Kanan, M. W. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13249 · Cited by 1,728
Activity Descriptors for CO 2 Electroreduction to Methane on Transition-Metal Catalysts
Peterson, A. A., & Nørskov, J. K. (2012) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/jz201461p · Cited by 1,667
Ren, D., Deng, Y., Handoko, A. D., Chen, C. S., Malkhandi, S., & Yeo, B. S. (2015) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/cs502128q · Cited by 930
Hsieh, Y.-C., Senanayake, S. D., Zhang, Y., Xu, W., & Polyansky, D. E. (2015) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.5b01235 · Cited by 396
Jia, F., Yu, X., & Zhang, L. (2014) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.12.002 · Cited by 228
Cited by
Carbon capture and conversion using metal–organic frameworks and MOF-based materials
Ding, M., Flaig, R. W., Jiang, H.-L., & Yaghi, O. M. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00829a · Cited by 2,616
Design Strategies toward Advanced MOF‐Derived Electrocatalysts for Energy‐Conversion Reactions
Liu, J., Zhu, D., Guo, C., Vasileff, A., & Qiao, S. (2017) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201700518 · Cited by 668
Indra, A., Song, T., & Paik, U. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201705146 · Cited by 507
Deng, P., Yang, F., Wang, Z., Chen, S., Zhou, Y., Zaman, S., & Xia, B. Y. (2020) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202000657 · Cited by 394
Self-citationXiao, C., & Zhang, J. (2021) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c10697 · Cited by 371
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, K., Liu, Y., Quan, X., Chen, S., & Yu, H.
- Venue
- ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2017-02-02
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 5302-5311
- ISSN
- 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8252
- OpenAlex
- W2579739462
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 6.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
