Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 341

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 99 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recent Advances in Catalytic Transfer Hydrogenation with Formic Acid over Heterogeneous Transition Metal Catalysts

Nie, Renfeng, Tao, Yuewen, Nie, Yunqing, Lu, Tianliang, Wang, Jianshe, Zhang, Yongsheng, Lu, Xiuyang, Xu, Chunbao Charles·2021·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

Transition-metal-catalyzed transfer hydrogenation with an in situ hydrogen donor has received a great deal of attention from both academia and industry as an alternative to the traditional high-pressure-hydrogen process, owing to its better efficiency, atom economy, and sustainability features. Hydrogen stored in the chemical bonds of formic acid (FA), a promising hydrogen storage compound that could be derived from biomass or reduction of CO 2, can be extracted selectively and used for diverse catalytic transformations. This Review summarizes and compares recent progress in catalytic transfer hydrogenation (CTH) via heterogeneous hydrogen transfer from FA. Transformations of biomass-derived platform chemicals (e.g., aromatic units, C5 and C6 sugars, furans, glycerol, fatty acids, levulinic acid (LA)), nitrogen-containing compounds (e.g., nitroarenes, quinolines), and organochlorinated compounds via transfer hydrogenation, hydrogenolysis, and hydrodechlorination (HDC) are outlined. Synthesis strategies of the heterogeneous metal catalysts (e.g., metal and support type, metal–support interaction, single-atom, alloy effect, and confinement effect) and optimization of the reaction conditions (e.g., temperature, solvents, additives, and FA dosages) for enhancing the catalytic activity and regulating the product distribution are presented. Structure–activity relationships based on both dehydrogenation and hydrogenation of metal catalysts as well as the mechanistic interpretation of CTH with FA are also highlighted. Finally, current challenges and outlook for the future development of the field are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscatal.0c04939

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Metadata

Authors
Nie, R., Tao, Y., Nie, Y., Lu, T., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Lu, X., & Xu, C. C.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2021-01-08
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
1071-1095
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3119902665
Cited by
341
References
99
FWCI
14.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.