Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 210

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enhanced Reduction of CO2 to CO over Cu–In Electrocatalysts: Catalyst Evolution Is the Key

Open access
Larrazábal, Gastón O., Martín, Antonio J., Mitchell, Sharon, Hauert, Roland, Pérez-Ramírez, Javier·2016·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

Abstract Copper–indium catalysts have recently shown promising performance for the selective electrochemical reduction of CO2 to CO. In this work, we prepared Cu–In nanoalloys by the in situ reduction of CuInO2 and In2O3-supported Cu nanoparticles and found that the structure of these nanoalloys evolves substantially over several electrocatalytic cycles, in parallel with an increase in the activity and selectivity for CO evolution. By combining electrochemical measurements with ex situ characterization techniques, such as XRD, STEM, elemental mapping, and XPS, we show that this behavior is caused by the segregation of copper and indium in these materials, resulting in the formation of a heterogeneous nanostructure of Cu-rich cores embedded within an In(OH)3 shell-like matrix. The evolved catalysts show high electrocatalytic performance at moderate overpotential (i.e., jCO > 1.5 mA cm–2 at −0.6 V vs RHE). We found that the removal of In(OH)3 from these heterogeneous nanostructures decreases the performance of the evolved catalysts, particularly in terms of the selectivity toward CO, which then recovers with the reappearance of the hydroxide following the re-equilibration of the material. On the other hand, an In(OH)3-supported Cu catalyst exhibits a current efficiency for CO comparable to that of the evolved nanoalloys without the need for an equilibration stage, indicating that In(OH)3 plays a crucial role in favoring the production of CO over Cu–In electrocatalysts. These findings shed light on the link between the architecture of these materials and their performance and underscore the potential of nonreducible hydroxides to act as promoters in CO2 reduction electrocatalysis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscatal.6b02067

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 210

Metadata

Authors
Larrazábal, G. O., Martín, A. J., Mitchell, S., Hauert, R., & Pérez-Ramírez, J.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2016-08-25
Volume
6
Issue
9
Pages
6265-6274
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2517363922
Cited by
210
References
8
FWCI
5.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.