Cited by 346Olfactory and Sensory Function StudiesSARS-CoV-2 detection and testingSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SARS-CoV-2: Olfaction, Brain Infection, and the Urgent Need for Clinical Samples Allowing Earlier Virus Detection

Open access
Butowt, Rafal, Bilinska, Katarzyna·2020·ACS Chemical Neuroscience

Abstract

The novel SARS-CoV-2 virus has very high infectivity, which allows it to spread rapidly around the world. Attempts at slowing the pandemic at this stage depend on the number and quality of diagnostic tests performed. We propose that the olfactory epithelium from the nasal cavity may be a more appropriate tissue for detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus at the earliest stages, prior to onset of symptoms or even in asymptomatic people, as compared to commonly used sputum or nasopharyngeal swabs. Here we emphasize that the nasal cavity olfactory epithelium is the likely site of enhanced binding of SARS-CoV-2. Multiple non-neuronal cell types present in the olfactory epithelium express two host receptors, ACE2 and TMPRSS2 proteases, that facilitate SARS-CoV-2 binding, replication, and accumulation. This may be the underlying mechanism for the recently reported cases of smell dysfunction in patients with COVID-19. Moreover, the possibility of subsequent brain infection should be considered which begins in olfactory neurons. In addition, we discuss the possibility that olfactory receptor neurons may initiate rapid immune responses at early stages of the disease. We emphasize the need to undertake research focused on additional aspects of SARS-CoV-2 actions in the nervous system, especially in the olfactory pathway.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acschemneuro.0c00172

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 346

Metadata

Authors
Butowt, R., & Bilinska, K.
Affiliations
L. Rydygier Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Ul. CurieSklodowskiej 9, 85-94 Bydgoszcz, Poland
Venue
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
Published
2020-04-13
Volume
11
Issue
9
Pages
1200-1203
ISSN
1948-7193 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3015599845
Cited by
346
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 111 · 2020: 124
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Chemical Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Polish National Science Center (UMO-2013/09/B/NZ3/02359)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 pandemic, olfactory epithelium, olfactory sensory neurons, virus detection, asymptomatic infection, ACE2, TMPRSS2, olfactory dysfunction, brain infection, olfactory pathway, nasal cavity, diagnostic sampling, immune response
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Animals, Brain, Humans, Immunity, Innate, Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A, Mass Screening, Olfactory Mucosa, Pneumonia, Viral, Serine Endopeptidases, Smell, Virus Replication, Olfactory Receptor Neurons, Coronavirus Infections, Respiratory Mucosa, Early Diagnosis, Mice, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review