Cited by 2,207Long-Term Effects of COVID-19SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Evidence of the COVID-19 virus targeting the CNS: tissue distribution, host-virus interaction, and proposed neurotropic mechanisms

Open access
Baig, Abdul Mannan, Khaleeq, Areeba, Ali, Usman, Syeda, Hira·2020·ACS Chemical Neuroscience

Abstract

The recent outbreak of coronavirus infectious disease 2019 (COVID-19) has gripped the world with apprehension and has evoked a scare of epic proportion regarding its potential to spread and infect humans worldwide. As we are in the midst of an ongoing pandemic of COVID-19, scientists are struggling to understand how it resembles and differs from the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) at the genomic and transcriptomic level. In a short time following the outbreak, it has been shown that, similar to SARS-CoV, COVID-19 virus exploits the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor to gain entry inside the cells. This finding raises the curiosity of investigating the expression of ACE2 in neurological tissue and determining the possible contribution of neurological tissue damage to the morbidity and mortality caused by COIVD-19. Here, we investigate the density of the expression levels of ACE2 in the CNS, the host-virus interaction and relate it to the pathogenesis and complications seen in the recent cases resulting from the COVID-19 outbreak. Also, we debate the need for a model for staging COVID-19 based on neurological tissue involvement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acschemneuro.0c00122

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SARS-CoV-2 spike protein could interact with ACE2 expressed in the capillary endothelium, and the virus may damage the blood-brain barrier and enter the CNS by attacking the vascular system.

    “In addition, given that SARS-CoV-2 spike protein could interact with ACE2 expressed in the capillary endothelium, the virus may also damage the blood–brain barrier and enter the CNS by attacking the vascular system (Baig et al., 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baig, A. M., Khaleeq, A., Ali, U., & Syeda, H.
Affiliations
  • Aga Khan University (PK)
  • Mohammad Ali Jinnah University (PK)
Corresponding author
Baig, Abdul Mannan
Venue
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
Published
2020-03-13
Volume
11
Issue
7
Pages
995-998
ISSN
1948-7193 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3011147220
Cited by
2,207
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 134 · 2023: 205 · 2022: 381 · 2021: 600 · 2020: 804 · 2018: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Chemical Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCommons - AKU (Aga Khan University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2, central nervous system, ACE2 receptor, host-virus interaction, neurotropism, neurological complications, tissue distribution, disease staging, pathogenesis
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Central Nervous System, Humans, Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A, Pneumonia, Viral, Receptors, Virus, Tissue Distribution, Coronavirus Infections, Host-Pathogen Interactions, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review