Cited by 27Receptor Mechanisms and SignalingNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

In Vitro Functional Profiling of Fentanyl and Nitazene Analogs at the μ-Opioid Receptor Reveals High Efficacy for Gi Protein Signaling

Open access
Tsai, Meng-Hua M., Chen, Li, Baumann, Michael H., Canals, Meritxell, Javitch, Jonathan A., Lane, J. Robert, Shi, Lei·2024·ACS Chemical Neuroscience

Abstract

Novel synthetic opioids (NSOs), including both fentanyl and non-fentanyl analogs that act as μ-opioid receptor (MOR) agonists, are associated with serious intoxication and fatal overdose. Previous studies proposed that G-protein-biased MOR agonists are safer pain medications, while other evidence indicates that low intrinsic efficacy at MOR better explains the reduced opioid side effects. Here, we characterized the in vitro functional profiles of various NSOs at the MOR using adenylate cyclase inhibition and β-arrestin2 recruitment assays, in conjunction with the application of the receptor depletion approach. By fitting the concentration–response data to the operational model of agonism, we deduced the intrinsic efficacy and affinity for each opioid in the Gi protein signaling and β-arrestin2 recruitment pathways. Compared to the reference agonist [ d -Ala 2, N -MePhe 4,Gly-ol 5 ]enkephalin, we found that several fentanyl analogs were more efficacious at inhibiting cAMP production, whereas all fentanyl analogs were less efficacious at recruiting β-arrestin2. In contrast, the non-fentanyl 2-benzylbenzimidazole (i.e., nitazene) analogs were highly efficacious and potent in both the cAMP and β-arrestin2 assays. Our findings suggest that the high intrinsic efficacy of the NSOs in Gi protein signaling is a common property that may underlie their high risk of intoxication and overdose, highlighting the limitation of using in vitro functional bias to predict the adverse effects of opioids. In addition, the extremely high potency of many NSOs now infiltrating illicit drug markets further contributes to the danger posed to public health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acschemneuro.3c00750

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many nitazenes demonstrate MOR binding affinities comparable to, or exceeding, those of morphine and fentanyl.

    “Many nitazenes demonstrate MOR binding affinities comparable to, or exceeding, those of morphine and fentanyl [29,30,31,32,33].”

    From Nitazenes: The Emergence of a Potent Synthetic Opioid Threat (2025) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that most tested nitazenes had higher model-derived pKA values than the fentanyls, supporting a comparison of MOR functional affinity. The Results section on functional bias (page unavailable) describes morphine as having lower functional affinity than DAMGO, but does not directly compare its binding affinity with the nitazenes. The paper’s functional-affinity and potency findings therefore do not fully establish the claimed binding-affinity comparison with both morphine and fentanyl. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Nitazenes act as highly potent and selective μ-opioid receptor (MOR) agonists, the primary site of action for therapeutic and adverse opioid effects.

    “Nitazenes act as highly potent and selective μ-opioid receptor (MOR) agonists, the primary site of action for therapeutic and adverse opioid effects.”

    From Nitazenes: The Emergence of a Potent Synthetic Opioid Threat (2025) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Introduction identifies nitazenes as potent MOR agonists, and the Results report high potency for nine nitazene analogs in a MOR signaling assay (pages not supplied). The paper links MOR activity to analgesic and adverse opioid effects, but the cited passages do not establish that nitazenes are selective for MOR over other receptors or that MOR is the primary site of those effects. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 64 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tsai, M.-H. M., Chen, L., Baumann, M. H., Canals, M., Javitch, J. A., Lane, J. R., & Shi, L.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Shi, Lei
Venue
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
Published
2024-02-12
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
854-867
ISSN
1948-7193 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391743638
Cited by
27
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 5
FWCI
3.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Chemical Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse (Z1A DA000606, Z1A DA000523)
  • Hope for Depression Research Foundation
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/T013966/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
novel synthetic opioids, fentanyl analogs, mu-opioid receptor, intrinsic efficacy, Gi protein signaling, β-arrestin2 recruitment, cAMP inhibition, receptor depletion, opioid overdose risk, opioid toxicity
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Opioid, Enkephalins, Fentanyl, Signal Transduction, Receptors, Opioid, mu, GTP-Binding Proteins, Enkephalin, Ala(2)-MePhe(4)-Gly(5)-

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review