Cited by 19Forensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentHIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk

Identification of the Novel Synthetic Opioid N ‐Pyrrolidino Isotonitazene at an Australian Drug Checking Service

Open access
Curtis, Blake, Lawes, Douglas J., Caldicott, David, McLeod, Malcolm D.·2025·Drug Testing and Analysis

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

2‐Benzylbenzimidazole opioids and related derivatives, also known as ‘nitazenes’, present a growing threat to public health. Emerging in Europe in 2019, the nitazene group of drugs is a recent addition to the novel synthetic opioid class and has been associated internationally with adverse effects in drug users, overdose clusters and significant mortality. The high potency of many nitazene derivatives, which can in many cases exceed that of fentanyl, poses a significant challenge to the public health and early warning systems used to detect and respond to the emergence of new high‐risk substances. This report describes close collaboration between an Australian drug checking service and a nearby university laboratory to identify and characterise the novel synthetic opioid N ‐pyrrolidino isotonitazene in an expected oxycodone sample presented by a member of the public. Though no prior publications are available describing the presence of this nitazene in the drug market, previously reported in vitro evaluation of this compound reveals it to be among the most potent nitazene opioid agonists known. The study highlights the rapid response possible though engaging drug users with drug checking services as a market monitor and early warning system to alert health services and the broader community to the presence of unexpected, high‐risk substances. Integration of well‐resourced and supported drug checking services provides a powerful approach to tackle the public health threats associated with novel synthetic opioids and other drugs of concern.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/dta.3910

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Curtis, B., Lawes, D. J., Caldicott, D., & McLeod, M. D.
Affiliations
Australian National University (AU)
Corresponding author
McLeod, Malcolm D.
Venue
Drug Testing and Analysis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-05-19
Volume
17
Issue
10
Pages
1996-2004
ISSN
  • 1942-7603 (ISSN-L)
  • 1942-7611
OpenAlex
W4410480035
Cited by
19
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 8
FWCI
9.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Drug Testing and Analysis (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
ACT Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
Keywords
nitazenes, synthetic opioids, drug checking, opioid potency, early warning systems, opioid overdose
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Opioid, Australia, Humans, Pyrrolidines, Illicit Drugs, Substance Abuse Detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review