Cited by 35Forensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisAlkaloids: synthesis and pharmacologyNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Characterization of Novel Nitazene Recreational Drugs: Insights into Their Risk Potential from in Vitro µ-Opioid Receptor Assays and in Vivo Behavioral Studies in Mice

Open access
Vandeputte, Marthe M., Glatfelter, Grant C., Walther, Donna, Layle, Nathan K., St. Germaine, Danielle M., Ujváry, István, Iula, Donna M., Baumann, Michael H. +1 more·2024·Pharmacological Research

Abstract

[H]DAMGO) binding assays in rat brain tissue. MOR activation (potency and efficacy) was studied by means of a cell-based β-arrestin 2 recruitment assay. For seven nitazenes, including etonitazene, opioid-like pharmacodynamic effects (antinociception, locomotor activity, body temperature changes) were evaluated after subcutaneous administration in male C57BL/6 J mice. The results showed that all nitazenes bound to MOR with nanomolar affinities, and the functional potency of several of them was comparable to or exceeded that of fentanyl. In vivo, dose-dependent effects were observed for antinociception, locomotor activity, and body temperature changes in mice. SAR insights included the high opioid-like activity of methionitazene, iso-butonitazene, sec-butonitazene, and the etonitazene analogues 1-ethyl-pyrrolidinylmethyl N-desalkyl etonitazene and ethylene etonitazene. The most potent analogue of the panel across all functional assays was α'-methyl etonitazene. Taken together, through critical pharmacological evaluation, this work provides a framework for strengthened preparedness and risk assessments of current and future nitazenes that have the potential to cause harm to users.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.phrs.2024.107503

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Minimal structural differences at the benzimidazole core, the N,N-dialkylaminoethyl side chain, and the para-substituted benzyl ring can profoundly alter receptor binding, potency, metabolism, and expected toxicity.

    “Although nitazenes are often discussed as a class, minimal structural differences at the benzimidazole core, the N, N- dialkylaminoethyl side chain, as well as the para-substituted benzyl ring can profoundly alter receptor binding, potency, metabolism, and expected toxicity [17].”

    From Novel 2-Benzylbenzimidazole Opioids: Emerging Drugs of Abuse and Pharmacological Considerations with Nitazene Analogs (2026) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Conclusions (page unavailable) report that changes to the benzimidazole substituent, amino side chain, and benzylbenzimidazole linker alter opioid activity; the Results report differences in µ-opioid receptor affinity and potency. The paper does not establish that these structural changes alter metabolism, and the Discussion says that specific adverse effects such as respiratory depression were beyond the study’s scope. It suggests overdose risk from high receptor potency and efficacy rather than measuring changes in toxicity. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Many nitazenes demonstrate MOR binding affinities comparable to, or exceeding, those of morphine and fentanyl.

    “Many nitazenes demonstrate MOR binding affinities comparable to, or exceeding, those of morphine and fentanyl [29,30,31,32,33].”

    From Nitazenes: The Emergence of a Potent Synthetic Opioid Threat (2025) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Results (page unavailable) report nanomolar MOR binding affinities for all tested nitazenes and say that fentanyl and morphine were among the reference opioids measured. The available binding passages do not establish that many nitazenes have affinities comparable to or greater than both drugs. The Results do compare some nitazenes with fentanyl on functional potency, but potency is not binding affinity. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This potency variation may partially explain the absence of compounds such as flunitazene and ethyleneoxynitazene in a substantial number of NPS Discovery biospecimens.

    “This may partially explain the absence of compounds such as flunitazene and ethyleneoxynitazene in a substantial number of NPS Discovery biospecimens [37].”

    From Temporal and geographical patterns of nitazene detections in drug samples and biospecimens in the United States, 2019–2024 (2026) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) ranks ethyleneoxynitazene among the less potent analogues, and the Conclusions report decreased in vitro and in vivo opioid activity for it. The paper does not establish that potency explains its absence from NPS Discovery biospecimens, or provide a corresponding finding for flunitazene; searches for those terms and biospecimens found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Nitazenes act as highly potent and selective μ-opioid receptor (MOR) agonists, the primary site of action for therapeutic and adverse opioid effects.

    “Nitazenes act as highly potent and selective μ-opioid receptor (MOR) agonists, the primary site of action for therapeutic and adverse opioid effects.”

    From Nitazenes: The Emergence of a Potent Synthetic Opioid Threat (2025) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Results report that all tested nitazenes activated MOR, while the Conclusions say most newly studied compounds had in vitro potency comparable to or greater than fentanyl. The Methods state that MOR selectivity had previously been demonstrated for many nitazenes, but this study did not test other opioid receptors. The copy does not establish that MOR is the primary site of both therapeutic and adverse opioid effects, and potency varied substantially across the compounds. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • It is possible to predict emerging nitazene analogues using advances in forensic intelligence and artificial intelligence tools.

    “Nowadays, with advances in forensic intelligence and artificial intelligence tools, it is possible to predict emerging nitazene analogues, as demonstrated in recent studies [30,39]”

    From Nitazenes: The Emergence of a Potent Synthetic Opioid Threat (2025) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Introduction (page not specified) describes a predictive approach: the authors selected possible future nitazene analogues, four of which were subsequently identified on the recreational drug market. It does not attribute that prediction to artificial intelligence tools or advances in forensic intelligence; the approach described is based on structural variations and pharmacological testing. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [16]United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, The growing complexity of the opioid crisis. Global SMART Update, Volume 24, United Nations publication, Vienna, 2020. https://www.unodc.org/documents/scientific/Global_SMART_Update_2020-Vol.24-Eng-Final.pdf.
  2. [53]Bucha M, Eppakayala L, Maringanti TC, A Facile Synthesis and Molecular Docking for Anti-inflammatory Activity of 2-(4-Chlorobenzyl)-1-(2-(pyrrolidin-1-yl) ethyl)-1H-benzo [d] imidazol-5-amine and 2-(4-Chlorobenzyl)-1-((1-ethylpyrrolidin-2-yl) methyl)-1H-benzo [d] imidazol-5-amine, Indian Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry 28 (2018) 321– 327.
  3. [62]Sparatore F, Boido V, Fanelli F, Dialchilamminoalchilbenzimidazoli d’interesse farmacologico., Farmaco 23 (1968) 344– 359. 5680377

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vandeputte, M. M., Glatfelter, G. C., Walther, D., Layle, N. K., St. Germaine, D. M., Ujváry, I., Iula, D. M., Baumann, M. H., & Stove, C. P.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Cayman Chemical (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Stove, Christophe P.
Venue
Pharmacological Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-12
Volume
210
Pages
107503
ISSN
1043-6618 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4404149532
Cited by
35
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 13
FWCI
8.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pharmacological Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse
  • Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds UGent
  • Research Foundation Flanders
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Alkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
nitazenes, recreational drugs, mu-opioid receptor, structure-activity relationship, antinociception, locomotor activity, body temperature, β-arrestin2, drug risk assessment, new psychoactive substances
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Opioid, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Benzimidazoles, Brain, Humans, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Motor Activity, Illicit Drugs, Structure-Activity Relationship, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Receptors, Opioid, mu, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review