Cited by 83Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingProtein Tyrosine PhosphatasesReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

Crystal Structure of a Human K-Ras G12D Mutant in Complex with GDP and the Cyclic Inhibitory Peptide KRpep-2d

Open access
Sogabe, Satoshi, Kamada, Yusuke, Miwa, Masanori, Niida, Ayumu, Sameshima, Tomoya, Kamaura, Masahiro, Yonemori, Kazuko, Sasaki, Shigekazu +2 more·2017·ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters

Abstract

The Ras proteins play roles in cell differentiation, proliferation, and survival. Aberrant signaling through Ras-mediated pathways in tumor cells occurs as a result of several types of mutational damage, which most frequently affects the amino acids G12, G13, and Q61. Recently, KRpep-2d was identified as a K-Ras(G12D) selective inhibitory peptide against the G12D mutant of K-Ras, which is a key member of the Ras protein family and an attractive cancer therapeutic target. In this study, the crystal structure of the human K-Ras(G12D) mutant was determined in complex with GDP and KRpep-2d at 1.25 Å resolution. This structure revealed that the peptide binds near Switch II and allosterically blocks protein-protein interactions with the guanine nucleotide exchange factor. This discovery of a unique binding pocket provides valuable information that will facilitate the design of direct Ras inhibitors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.7b00128

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The crystal structure of KRASG12D-GDP with KRpep-2d showed that this KRASG12D-selective inhibitory peptide binds near switch 2 and competes with GEF binding.

    “By contrast, the crystal structure of KRASG12D-GDP in a complex with KRpep-2d revealed that this KRASG12D-selective inhibitory peptide binds to a region near switch 2 and competes with GEF binding175.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sogabe, S., Kamada, Y., Miwa, M., Niida, A., Sameshima, T., Kamaura, M., Yonemori, K., Sasaki, S., Sakamoto, J.-I., & Sakamoto, K.
Affiliations
Takeda (Japan) (JP)
Corresponding author
  • Sogabe, Satoshi
  • Sakamoto, Kotaro
Venue
ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters
Published
2017-05-15
Volume
8
Issue
7
Pages
732-736
ISSN
1948-5875 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2612770567
Cited by
83
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
GDP binding, switch II, allosteric inhibition, guanine nucleotide exchange factor, cancer therapy targets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review