The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EGGNet, a Generalizable Geometric Deep Learning Framework for Protein Complex Pose Scoring
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Computational prediction of molecule-protein interactions has been key for developing new molecules to interact with a target protein for therapeutics development. Previous work includes two independent streams of approaches: (1) predicting protein-protein interactions (PPIs) between naturally occurring proteins and (2) predicting binding affinities between proteins and small-molecule ligands [also known as drug-target interaction (DTI)]. Studying the two problems in isolation has limited the ability of these computational models to generalize across the PPI and DTI tasks, both of which ultimately involve noncovalent interactions with a protein target. In this work, we developed Equivariant Graph of Graphs neural Network (EGGNet), a geometric deep learning (GDL) framework, for molecule-protein binding predictions that can handle three types of molecules for interacting with a target protein: (1) small molecules, (2) synthetic peptides, and (3) natural proteins. EGGNet leverages a graph of graphs (GoG) representation constructed from the molecular structures at atomic resolution and utilizes a multiresolution equivariant graph neural network to learn from such representations. In addition, EGGNet leverages the underlying biophysics and makes use of both atom- and residue-level interactions, which improve EGGNet's ability to rank candidate poses from blind docking. EGGNet achieves competitive performance on both a public protein-small-molecule binding affinity prediction task (80.2% top 1 success rate on CASF-2016) and a synthetic protein interface prediction task (88.4% area under the precision-recall curve). We envision that the proposed GDL framework can generalize to many other protein interaction prediction problems, such as binding site prediction and molecular docking, helping accelerate protein engineering and structure-based drug development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Unified rational protein engineering with sequence-based deep representation learning
Alley, E. C., Khimulya, G., Biswas, S., AlQuraishi, M., & Church, G. M. (2019) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0598-1 · Cited by 1,131
Cang, Z., Mu, L., & Wei, G.-W. (2018) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005929 · Cited by 257
Learning protein sequence embeddings using information from structure
Bepler, T., & Berger, B. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.08661 · Cited by 219
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- 10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102548 · DOI · Paper page
- D’Agostino G., 2014, Networks of networks: the last frontier of complexity, 340, 10.1007/978-3-319-03518-5 · DOI
- Ni, J.; Tong, H.; Fan, W.; Zhang, X. Inside the atoms: ranking on a network of networks. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining , 2014; pp 1356–1365. · DOI
- 10.1186/s12859-020-3378-0 · DOI
- Wang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Shah, N.; Derr, T. Imbalanced Graph Classification via Graph-of-Graph Neural Networks. In Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management , 2022; pp 2067–2076. · DOI
- Wang, H.; Lian, D.; Zhang, Y.; Qin, L.; Lin, X. GoGNN: graph of graphs neural network for predicting structured entity interactions. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Conference on International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence , 2021; pp 1317–1323. · DOI
- 10.1039/D1SC06946B · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00650 · DOI
- 10.1039/C9CP06554G · DOI
- 10.1126/sciadv.abc5329 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009943 · DOI
- 10.1021/acscentsci.8b00507 · DOI
- Gilmer, J.; Schoenholz, S. S.; Riley, P. F.; Vinyals, O.; Dahl, G. E. Neural message passing for quantum chemistry. In International conference on machine learning , 2017; pp 1263–1272.
- Veličković, P.; Cucurull, G.; Casanova, A.; Romero, A.; Liò, P.; Bengio, Y. Graph Attention Networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2018.
- Somnath V. R., 2021, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34, 25244
- 10.1073/pnas.2016239118 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3095381 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-021-27396-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac551 · DOI · Paper page
- Ingraham J., 2019, Advances in neural information processing systems, 32
- Jing, B.; Eismann, S.; Suriana, P.; Townshend, R. J. L.; Dror, R. Learning from Protein Structure with Geometric Vector Perceptrons. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2021.
- 10.1021/ci100050t · DOI
- Edwards, C.; Lai, T.; Ros, K.; Honke, G.; Cho, K.; Ji, H. Translation between Molecules and Natural Language. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates , 2022; pp 375–413. · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-022-10775-y · DOI
- 10.1021/jm030580l · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-020-14301-4 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12900-014-0022-0 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2105-13-334 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00545 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac759 · DOI · Paper page
- Paszke A., 2019, Advances in neural information processing systems, 32
- Xu, K.; Hu, W.; Leskovec, J.; Jegelka, S. How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks? In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2018.
- 10.1126/scisignal.aaa6711 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-021-25772-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.05.022 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz437 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12859-018-2414-9 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Z., Brand, R., Adolf-Bryfogle, J., Grewal, J., Qi, Y., Combs, S. A., Golovach, N., Alford, R., Rangwala, H., & Clark, P. M.
- Affiliations
- Amazon (United States) (US)
- Janssen Biotherapeutics, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Spring House, Titusville, New Jersey 08560-1504, United States
- Johnson & Johnson (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Zichen
- Rangwala, Huzefa
- Clark, Peter M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- ACS Omega
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2024-02-09
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 7471-7479
- ISSN
- 2470-1343 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10882658
- OpenAlex
- W4391676149
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- ACS Omega (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Keywords
- protein-protein interaction, drug-target interactions, binding affinity prediction, equivariant graph neural networks, molecular docking, protein interface prediction, structure-based drug design, protein engineering
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review