Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 553

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In-Situ-Reduced Synthesis of Ti3+Self-Doped TiO2/g-C3N4Heterojunctions with High Photocatalytic Performance under LED Light Irradiation

Li, Kai, Gao, Shanmin, Wang, Qingyao, Xu, Hui, Wang, Zeyan, Huang, Baibiao, Dai, Ying, Lu, Jun·2015·ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Abstract

A simple one-step calcination route was used to prepare Ti(3+) self-doped TiO2/g-C3N4 heterojunctions by mixture of H2Ti3O7 and melamine. X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), electron spin resonance (ESR) spectroscopy, and UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (UV-vis DRS) technologies were used to characterize the structure, crystallinity, morphology, and chemical state of the as-prepared samples. The absorption of the prepared Ti(3+) self-doped TiO2/g-C3N4 heterojunctions shifted to a longer wavelength region in comparison with pristine TiO2 and g-C3N4. The photocatalytic activities of the heterojunctions were studied by degrading methylene blue under a 30 W visible-light-emitting diode irradiation source. The visible-light photocatalytic activities enhanced by the prepared Ti(3+) self-doped TiO2/g-C3N4 heterojunctions were observed and proved to be better than that of pure TiO2 and g-C3N4. The photocatalysis mechanism was investigated and discussed. The intensive separation efficiency of photogenerated electron-hole in the prepared heterojunction was confirmed by photoluminescence (PL) spectra. The removal rate constant reached 0.038 min(-1) for the 22.3 wt % Ti(3+) self-doped TiO2/g-C3N4 heterojunction, which was 26.76 and 7.6 times higher than that of pure TiO2 and g-C3N4, respectively. The established heterojunction between the interfaces of TiO2 nanoparticles and g-C3N4 nanosheets as well as introduced Ti(3+) led to the rapid electron transfer rate and improved photoinduced electron-hole pair's separation efficiency, resulting in the improved photocatalytic performance of the Ti(3+) self-doped TiO2/g-C3N4 heterojunctions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/am508505n

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 553

Metadata

Authors
Li, K., Gao, S., Wang, Q., Xu, H., Wang, Z., Huang, B., Dai, Y., & Lu, J.
Venue
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Published
2015-04-27
Volume
7
Issue
17
Pages
9023-9030
ISSN
  • 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8252
OpenAlex
W2020107131
Cited by
553
References
44
FWCI
18.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.