The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting Hydrogen-Bond Strengths from Acid−Base Molecular Properties. The p Ka Slide Rule: Toward the Solution of a Long-Lasting Problem
Abstract
Unlike normal chemical bonds, hydrogen bonds (H-bonds) characteristically feature binding energies and contact distances that do not simply depend on the donor (D) and acceptor (:A) nature. Instead, their chemical context can lead to large variations even for a same donor-acceptor couple. As a striking example, the weak HO-H...OH(2) bond in neutral water changes, in acidic or basic medium, to the 6-fold stronger and 15% shorter [H(2)O...H...OH(2)](+) or [HO...H...OH](-) bonds. This surprising behavior, sometimes called the H-bond puzzle, practically prevents prediction of H-bond strengths from the properties of the interacting molecules. Explaining this puzzle has been the main research interest of our laboratory in the last 20 years. Our first contribution was the proposal of RAHB (resonance-assisted H-bond), a new type of strong H-bond where donor and acceptor are linked by a short pi-conjugated fragment. The RAHB discovery prompted new studies on strong H-bonds, finally leading to a general H-bond classification in six classes, called the six chemical leitmotifs, four of which include all known types of strong bonds. These studies attested to the covalent nature of the strong H-bond showing, by a formal valence-bond treatment, that weak H-bonds are basically electrostatic while stronger ones are mixtures of electrostatic and covalent contributions. The covalent component gradually increases as the difference of donor-acceptor proton affinities, DeltaPA, or acidic constants, DeltapK(a), approaches zero. At this limit, the strong and symmetrical D...H...A bonds formed can be viewed as true three-center-four-electron covalent bonds. These results emphasize the role PA/pK(a) equalization plays in strengthening the H-bond, a hypothesis often invoked in the past but never fully verified. In this Account, this hypothesis is reconsidered by using a new instrument, the pK(a) slide rule, a bar chart that reports in separate scales the pK(a)'s of the D-H proton donors and :A proton acceptors most frequently involved in D-H...:A bond formation. Allowing the two scales to shift so to bring selected donor and acceptor molecules into coincidence, the ruler permits graphical evaluation of DeltapK(a) and then empirical appreciation of the D-H...:A bond strength according to the pK(a) equalization principle. Reliability of pK(a) slide rule predictions has been verified by extensive comparison with two classical sources of H-bond strengths: (i) the gas-phase dissociation enthalpies of charged [X...H...X](-) and [X...H...X](+) bonds derived from the thermodynamic NIST Database and (ii) the geometries of more than 9500 H-bonds retrieved from the Cambridge Structural Database. The results attest that the pK(a) slide rule provides a reliable solution for the long-standing problem of H-bond-strength prediction and represents an efficient and practical tool for making such predictions directly accessible to all scientists.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Cambridge Structural Database: a quarter of a million crystal structures and rising
Allen, F. H. (2002) · Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Science · doi:10.1107/s0108768102003890 · Cited by 9,898
Hydrogen Bonding in Biological Structures
Jeffrey, G. A., & Saenger, W. (1991) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-85135-3 · Cited by 2,566
CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 2009−2010, 90th ed.
(2009) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja906434c · Cited by 1,494
Low-Barrier Hydrogen Bonds and Enzymic Catalysis
Cleland, W. W., & Kreevoy, M. M. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8009219 · Cited by 1,146
Gilli, G., Bellucci, F., Ferretti, V., & Bertolasi, V. (1989) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00185a035 · Cited by 1,141
Self-citationGilli, P., Bertolasi, V., Ferretti, V., & Gilli, G. (1994) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00082a011 · Cited by 1,074
Self-citationThe inorganic crystal structure data base
Bergerhoff, G., Hundt, R., Sievers, R., & Brown, I. D. (1983) · Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences · doi:10.1021/ci00038a003 · Cited by 946
“STRONG” HYDROGEN BONDS IN CHEMISTRY AND BIOLOGY
Perrin, C. L., & Nielson, J. B. (1997) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.48.1.511 · Cited by 829
The Nature of the Hydrogen Bond
Gilli, G., & Gilli, P. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199558964.001.0001 · Cited by 819
Self-citationIon Thermochemistry and Solvation From Gas Phase Ion Equilibria
Kebarle, P. (1977) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.pc.28.100177.002305 · Cited by 763
A Low-Barrier Hydrogen Bond in the Catalytic Triad of Serine Proteases
Frey, P. A., Whitt, S. A., & Tobin, J. B. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7661899 · Cited by 726
Towards an unified hydrogen-bond theory
Gilli, G., & Gilli, P. (2000) · Journal of Molecular Structure · doi:10.1016/s0022-2860(00)00454-3 · Cited by 681
Self-citationOne-Dimensional Model of the Hydrogen Bond
Lippincott, E. R., & Schroeder, R. (1955) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1742196 · Cited by 634
Molecular structure and energetics
Liebman, J. F., & Greenberg, A. (1986) · VCH Publishers eBooks · Cited by 571
POLARITY AND IONIZATION FROM THE STANDPOINT OF THE LEWIS THEORY OF VALENCE.
Latimer, W. M., & Rodebush, W. H. (1920) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja01452a015 · Cited by 526
On Low-Barrier Hydrogen Bonds and Enzyme Catalysis
Warshel, A., Papazyan, A., & Kollman, P. A. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7661987 · Cited by 316
Gilli, P., Bertolasi, V., Pretto, L., Lyčka, A., & Gilli, G. (2002) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja020589x · Cited by 273
Self-citationThe Energetics of Hydrogen Bonds in Model Systems: Implications for Enzymatic Catalysis
Shan, S., Loh, S. N., & Herschlag, D. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.272.5258.97 · Cited by 260
Harris, T. K., & Mildvan, A. S. (1999) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(19990515)35:3<275::aid-prot1>3.0.co;2-v · Cited by 172
Determination of acidity constants
Cookson, R. F. (1974) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr60287a002 · Cited by 162
Target-Related Applications of First Principles Quantum Chemical Methods in Drug Design
Cavalli, A., Carloni, P., & Recanatini, M. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr050579p · Cited by 121
On a hard/soft hydrogen bond interaction
Huyskens, P., Sobczyk, L., & Majerz, I. (2002) · Journal of Molecular Structure · doi:10.1016/s0022-2860(02)00207-7 · Cited by 22
Cited by
Low-transition-temperature mixtures (LTTMs): A new generation of designer solvents
Francisco, M., van den Bruinhorst, A., & Kroon, M. C. (2013) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201207548 · Cited by 1,378
Defining the hydrogen bond: An account (IUPAC Technical Report)
Arunan, E., Desiraju, G. R., Klein, R. A., Sadlej, J., Scheiner, S., Alkorta, I., Clary, D. C., Crabtree, R. H., Dannenberg, J. J., Hobza, P., et al. (2011) · Pure and Applied Chemistry · doi:10.1351/pac-rep-10-01-01 · Cited by 1,021
Francisco, M., van den Bruinhorst, A., & Kroon, M. C. (2012) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c2gc35660k · Cited by 814
Zhu, Y., Han, J., Wang, J., Shibata, N., Sodeoka, M., Soloshonok, V. A., Coelho, J. A. S., & Toste, F. D. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00778 · Cited by 640
Experimental Binding Energies in Supramolecular Complexes
Biedermann, F., & Schneider, H.-J. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00583 · Cited by 554
Metadata
- Authors
- Gilli, P., Pretto, L., Bertolasi, V., & Gilli, G.
- Venue
- Accounts of Chemical Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-10-16
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-44
- ISSN
- 0001-4842 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4898
- OpenAlex
- W1988195234
- Cited by
- 744
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 19.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.