The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Improvement of MRI Probes To Allow Efficient Detection of Gene Expression
Abstract
Recently, it has been demonstrated that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) utilizing monocrystalline iron oxide nanoparticles (MIONs) targeted to an engineered transferrin receptor enables imaging of gene expression. However, the relatively high doses of iron oxides used indicated the need for improved MR imaging probes to monitor changes in gene expression in vivo. Using alternative conjugation chemistries to link targeting ligands and iron oxide nanoparticles, we present the development and characterization as well as improved receptor binding and MRI detection of a novel imaging probe. Iron oxide nanoparticles with a cross-linked dextran coat were conjugated to transferrin (Tf) through the linker molecule N-succinimidyl 3-(2-pyridyldithio)propionate (SPDP) to yield Tf-S-S-CLIO. The characteristics of this conjugate were evaluated in comparison to Tf-MION and Tf-CLIO generated by oxidative activation of the dextran-coat with subsequent reduction of Schiff's base. SPDP conjugation allowed approximately a 4-fold increase in the number of Tf molecules attached per iron oxide nanoparticle and resulted in a more than 10-fold improvement of binding and uptake by cells. This translated into an imaging probe that was 16 times better for imaging gene expression in a cellular MRI assay. This novel probe for MRI may substantially increase the sensitivity for the detection of endogenous or genetically induced transferrin receptor expression in small numbers of cells and may significantly reduce the imaging dose from over 100 mg/kg to doses of iron oxides that are currently used in clinical imaging.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Laurent, S., Forge, D., Port, M., Roch, A., Robic, C., Vander Elst, L., & Muller, R. N. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068445e · Cited by 6,852
Multifunctional magnetic nanoparticles for targeted imaging and therapy
MCCARTHY, J., & WEISSLEDER, R. (2008) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2008.03.014 · Cited by 892
Self-citationSuperparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticle Probes for Molecular Imaging
Thorek, D. L. J., Chen, A. K., Czupryna, J., & Tsourkas, A. (2006) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10439-005-9002-7 · Cited by 772
In Vivo MRI Detection of Gliomas by Chlorotoxin‐Conjugated Superparamagnetic Nanoprobes
Sun, C., Veiseh, O., Gunn, J., Fang, C., Hansen, S., Lee, D., Sze, R., Ellenbogen, R. G., Olson, J., & Zhang, M. (2008) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.200700784 · Cited by 329
Targeting strategies for superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles in cancer therapy
Zhi, D., Yang, T., Yang, J., Fu, S., & Zhang, S. (2020) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2019.11.027 · Cited by 283
Use of magnetic nanoparticles as nanosensors to probe for molecular interactions
Perez, J. M., Josephson, L., & Weissleder, R. (2004) · ChemBioChem · doi:10.1002/cbic.200300730 · Cited by 268
Self-citationEngineered nanoparticles for biomolecular imaging
Mahmoudi, M., Serpooshan, V., & Laurent, S. (2011) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c1nr10326a · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Högemann, D., Josephson, L., Weissleder, R., & Basilion, J. P.
- Venue
- Bioconjugate Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2000-11-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 941-946
- ISSN
- 1043-1802 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4812
- OpenAlex
- W2042734595
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.