Cited by 57RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyMicrobial Natural Products and Biosynthesis

Single protein omission reconstitution studies of tetracycline binding to the 30S subunit of Escherichia coli ribosomes

Buck, Melissa A., Cooperman, Barry S.·1990·Biochemistry

Abstract

In previous work we showed that on photolysis of Escherichia coli ribosomes in the presence of [3H]tetracycline (TC) the major protein labeled is S7, and we presented strong evidence that such labeling takes place from a high-affinity site related to the inhibitory action of TC [Goldman, R. A., Hasan, T., Hall, C. C., Strycharz, W. A., & Cooperman, B. S. (1983) Biochemistry 22, 359-368]. In this work we use single protein omission reconstitution (SPORE) experiments to identify those proteins that are important for high-affinity TC binding to the 30S subunit, as measured by both cosedimentation and filter binding assays. With respect to both sedimentation coefficients and relative Phe-tRNAPhe binding, the properties of the SPORE particles we obtain parallel very closely those measured earlier [Nomura, M., Mizushima, S., Ozaki, M., Traub, P., & Lowry, C. V. (1969) Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 34, 49-61], with the exception of the SPORE particle lacking S13. A total of five proteins, S3, S7, S8, S14, and S19, are shown to be important for TC binding, with the largest effects seen on omission of proteins S7 and S14. Determination of the protein compositions of the corresponding SPORE particles demonstrates that the observed effects are, for the most part, directly attributable to the omission of the given protein rather than reflecting an indirect effect of omitting one protein on the uptake of another. A large body of evidence supports the notion that four of these prot…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bi00474a024

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buck, M. A., & Cooperman, B. S.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Biochemistry
Published
1990-06-05
Volume
29
Issue
22
Pages
5374-5379
ISSN
  • 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4995
OpenAlex
W2016159844
Cited by
57
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (2r01ai016806-06)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI16806)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
Keywords
30S ribosomal subunit, Escherichia coli ribosome, ribosomal proteins, 16S rRNA
MeSH terms
Bacterial Proteins, Binding Sites, Centrifugation, Escherichia coli, Molecular Weight, Protein Binding, Ribosomal Proteins, Ribosomes, RNA, Transfer, Phe, Tetracycline

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review