Cited by 67Nanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and CharacterizationSurfactants and Colloidal Systems

Block and Random Copolymers Bearing Cholic Acid and Oligo(ethylene glycol) Pendant Groups: Aggregation, Thermosensitivity, and Drug Loading

Open access
Shao, Yu, Jia, Yong-Guang, Shi, Changying, Luo, Juntao, Zhu, X. X.·2014·Biomacromolecules

Abstract

A series of block and random copolymers consisting of oligo(ethylene glycol) and cholic acid pendant groups were synthesized via ring-opening metathesis polymerization of their norbornene derivatives. These block and random copolymers were designed to have similar molecular weights and comonomer ratios; both types of copolymers showed thermosensitivity in aqueous solutions with similar cloud points. The copolymers self-assembled into micelles in water as shown by dynamic light scattering and transmission electron microscopy. The hydrodynamic diameter of the micelles formed by the block copolymer is much larger and exhibited a broad and gradual shrinkage from 20 to 54 °C below its cloud point, while the micelles formed by the random copolymers are smaller in size but exhibited some swelling in the same temperature range. Based on in vitro drug release studies, 78% and 24% paclitaxel (PTX) were released in 24 h from micelles self-assembled by the block and random copolymers, respectively. PTX-loaded micelles formed by the block and random copolymers exhibited apparent antitumor efficacy toward the ovarian cancer cells with a particularly low half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 27.4 and 40.2 ng/mL, respectively. Cholic acid-based micelles show promise as a versatile and potent platform for cancer chemotherapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bm5002262

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies have highlighted that not only composition, but also architecture and monomer distributions of copolymers could strongly affect their thermal, mechanical and aggregation properties.

    “Previous studies have highlighted that not only the composition, but also the architecture and monomers distributions of copolymers could strongly affect their thermal, mechanical and aggregation properties [36,37,38].”

    From Thermo-Rheological and Shape Memory Properties of Block and Random Copolymers of Lactide and ε-Caprolactone (2021) · cites this paper as [36]

    In Results and Discussion, “Self-Assembly of Block and Random Copolymers” (page unavailable), block and random copolymers of similar composition form micelles with different sizes and temperature-dependent behavior, supporting an effect of monomer distribution on aggregation. The same section says their cloud points do not differ significantly, and the paper does not establish an effect on mechanical properties. Thus it supports only part of the broad claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Choi T.-L.; Grubbs R. H. Angew. Chem. 2003, 115, 1785– 1788.
  2. Leitgeb A.; Wappel J.; Slugovc C. Polymer 2010, 51, 2927– 2946.
  3. Bielawski C. W.; Grubbs R. H. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2007, 32, 1– 29.
  4. Soppimath K. S.; Tan D. C. W.; Yang Y. Y. Adv. Mater. 2005, 17, 318– 323.
  5. Patrickios C. S.; Hertler W. R.; Abbott N. L.; Hatton T. A. Macromolecules 1994, 27, 930– 937.
  6. Liu R.; Fraylich M.; Saunders B. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2009, 287, 627– 643.
  7. Lutz J.-F. J. Polym. Sci.: Polym. Chem. 2008, 46, 3459– 3470.
  8. Lutz J.-F.; Hoth A. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 893– 896.
  9. Zarafshani Z.; Obata T.; Lutz J.-F. Biomacromolecules 2010, 11, 2130– 2135. 20690720
  10. Bauer T.; Slugovc C. J. Polym. Sci.: Polym. Chem. 2010, 48, 2098– 2108.
  11. Mukhopadhyay S.; Maitra U. Curr. Sci. 2004, 87, 1666– 1684.
  12. Zhang Y. H.; Zhu X. X. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 1996, 197, 3473– 3482.
  13. Liu H.; Avoce D.; Song Z.; Zhu X. X. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2001, 22, 675– 680.
  14. Avoce D.; Liu H. Y.; Zhu X. X. Polymer 2003, 44, 1081– 1087.
  15. Zhang G.; Wu C. Adv. Polym. Sci. 2006, 195, 101– 176.
  16. Shao Y.; Lavigueur C.; Zhu X. X. Macromolecules 2012, 45, 1924– 1930.
  17. Pulamagatta B.; Pankaj S.; Beiner M.; Binder W. H. Macromolecules 2011, 44, 958– 965.
  18. Sandholzer M.; Fritz-Popovski G.; Slugovc C. J. Polym. Sci.: Polym. Chem. 2008, 46, 401– 413.
  19. Perrott M. G.; Novak B. M. Macromolecules 1995, 28, 3492– 3494.
  20. Cheng H.; Shen L.; Wu C. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 2325– 2329.
  21. Cai W. S.; Gan L. H.; Tam K. C. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2001, 279, 793– 799.
  22. Verbrugghe S.; Laukkanen A.; Aseyev V.; Tenhu H.; Winnik F. M.; Du Prez F. E. Polymer 2003, 44, 6807– 6814.
  23. Gorelov A. V.; Du Chesne A.; Dawson K. A. Physica A 1997, 240, 443– 452.
  24. Bae J. W.; Lee E.; Park K. M.; Park K. D. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 3437– 3442.
  25. Morinaga H.; Morikawa H.; Wang Y.; Sudo A.; Endo T. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 2229– 2235.
  26. Khlebtsov N. G. Colloid J. 2003, 65, 652– 655.
  27. Zhulina E. B.; Borisov O. V.; Pryamitsyn V. A.; Birshtein T. M. Macromolecules 1991, 24, 140– 149.
  28. Zhang W.; Zhou X.; Li H.; Fang Y.; Zhang G. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 909– 914.
  29. Messaoud T.; Duplatre G.; Michels B.; Waton G. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 13137– 13143.
  30. Zhang L.; Zhao C.; Zhou J.; Kondo T. J. Mater. Chem. C 2013, 1, 5756– 5764.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shao, Y., Jia, Y.-G., Shi, C., Luo, J., & Zhu, X. X.
Affiliations
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • SUNY Upstate Medical University (US)
Corresponding author
Zhu, X. X.
Venue
Biomacromolecules
Published
2014-04-11
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
1837-1844
ISSN
  • 1525-7797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4602
OpenAlex
W2330307975
Cited by
67
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biomacromolecules (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  • Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA140449)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Surfactants and Colloidal Systems
Keywords
cholic acid, oligo(ethylene glycol), block copolymers, random copolymers, thermoresponsive polymers, cloud point, micelle self-assembly, paclitaxel, drug loading, controlled drug release, ovarian cancer, antitumor efficacy, ring-opening metathesis polymerization, norbornene derivatives
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Cell Survival, Drug Carriers, Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor, Female, Humans, Micelles, Models, Molecular, Ovarian Neoplasms, Particle Size, Polymers, Surface Properties, Temperature, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Molecular Structure, Paclitaxel, Cholic Acid, Ethylene Glycol, Inhibitory Concentration 50, Hydrodynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review