Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 189

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rational Tuning the Optical Properties of Metal Sulfide Nanocrystals and Their Applications

Shen, Shuling, Wang, Qiangbin·2013·Chemistry of Materials

Abstract

This short review provides an overview of recent progress in rational tuning of the optical properties of metal sulfide nanocrystals. Three kinds of tuning strategy are discussed in detail: composition control, doping, and manufacturing heterostructured metal sulfide nanocrystals. We lay emphases on the tuning of optical properties of metal sulfide nanocrystals and the novel properties generating during these tuning processes that have provided scientists with new opportunities for tailoring and designing the properties of metal sulfide nanocrystals. Examples of applications of metal sulfide nanomaterials with unique optical properties are provided to demonstrate the end goals of such research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cm302482d

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Shen, S., & Wang, Q.
Venue
Chemistry of Materials
Published
2012-12-04
Volume
25
Issue
8
Pages
1166-1178
ISSN
  • 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5002
OpenAlex
W2333804841
Cited by
189
References
8
FWCI
7.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.