The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rationale of Drug Encapsulation and Release from Biocompatible Porous Metal–Organic Frameworks
Abstract
A joint experimental and computational systematic exploration of the driving forces that govern (i) encapsulation of active ingredients (solvent, starting material dehydration, drug/material ratio, immersion time, and several consecutive impregnations) and (i) its kinetics of delivery (structure, polarity, ...) was performed using a series of porous biocompatible metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) that bear different topologies, connectivities, and chemical compositions. The liporeductor cosmetic caffeine was selected as the active molecule. Its encapsulation is a challenge for the cosmetic industry due to its high tendency to crystallize leading to poor loadings (<5 wt %) and uncontrolled releases with a subsequent low efficiency. It was evidenced that caffeine entrapping reaches exceptional payloads up to 50 wt %, while progressive release of this cosmetic agent upon immersion in the simulated physiological media (phosphate buffer solution pH = 7.4 or distilled water pH = 6.3, 37 °C) occurred mainly depending on the degree of MOF stability, caffeine mobility, and MOF–caffeine interactions. Thus, MIL-100 and UiO-66 appear as very promising carriers for topical administration of caffeine with both spectacular cosmetic payloads and progressive releases within 24 h.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set
Kresse, G., & Furthmüller, J. (1996) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.54.11169 · Cited by 123,652
Projector augmented-wave method
Blöchl, P. E. (1994) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.50.17953 · Cited by 92,732
From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method
Kresse, G., & Joubert, D. (1999) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.59.1758 · Cited by 85,307
Modeling and comparison of dissolution profiles
Costa, P., & Sousa Lobo, J. M. (2001) · European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0928-0987(01)00095-1 · Cited by 5,509
Horike, S., Shimomura, S., & Kitagawa, S. (2009) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.444 · Cited by 2,486
Weerheim, A., & Ponec, M. (2001) · Archives of Dermatological Research · doi:10.1007/s004030100212 · Cited by 302
Cited by
Water Stability and Adsorption in Metal–Organic Frameworks
Burtch, N. C., Jasuja, H., & Walton, K. S. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr5002589 · Cited by 2,730
Amorphous Metal–Organic Frameworks
Bennett, T. D., & Cheetham, A. K. (2014) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar5000314 · Cited by 678
Application of zirconium MOFs in drug delivery and biomedicine
Abánades Lázaro, I., & Forgan, R. S. (2019) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2018.09.009 · Cited by 678
Metal-organic frameworks for advanced drug delivery
He, S., Wu, L., Li, X., Sun, H., Xiong, T., Liu, J., Huang, C., Xu, H., Sun, H., Chen, W., et al. (2021) · Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B · doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2021.03.019 · Cited by 528
When defects turn into virtues: The curious case of zirconium-based metal-organic frameworks
Taddei, M. (2017) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2017.04.010 · Cited by 341
Metadata
- Authors
- Cunha, D., Ben Yahia, M., Hall, S., Miller, S. R., Chevreau, H., Elkaïm, E., Maurin, G., Horcajada, P., & Serre, C.
- Venue
- Chemistry of Materials
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-07-08
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 2767-2776
- ISSN
- 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5002
- OpenAlex
- W2001059668
- Cited by
- 483
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 22.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.