Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2,020

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

New Approaches to Nanofabrication: Molding, Printing, and Other Techniques

Gates, Byron D., Xu, Qiaobing, Stewart, Michael, Ryan, Declan, Willson, C. Grant, Whitesides, George M.·2005·Chemical Reviews
DOI 10.1021/cr030076o
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVArticleNEXTNew Approaches to Nanofabrication: Molding, Printing, and Other TechniquesByron D. Gates, Qiaobing Xu, Michael Stewart, Declan Ryan, C. Grant Willson, and George M. WhitesidesView Author Information Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, 12 Oxford Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station, Austin, Texas 78712 Cite this: Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 4, 1171–1196Publication Date (Web):March 4, 2005Publication History Received4 August 2004Published online4 March 2005Published inissue 1 April 2005https://doi.org/10.1021/cr030076oCopyright © 2005 American Chemical SocietyRIGHTS & PERMISSIONSArticle Views20177Altmetric-Citations1715LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InReddit Read OnlinePDF (1 MB) Get e-AlertscloseSUBJECTS:Lithography,Materials,Metals,Nanofabrication,Thin films Get e-Alerts

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cr030076o

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 2,020

Metadata

Authors
Gates, B. D., Xu, Q., Stewart, M., Ryan, D., Willson, C. G., & Whitesides, G. M.
Venue
Chemical Reviews
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2005-03-04
Volume
105
Issue
4
Pages
1171-1196
ISSN
  • 0009-2665 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6890
DOI
10.1021/cr030076o
OpenAlex
W2081875458
Cited by
2,020
References
6
FWCI
10.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New Approaches to Nanofabrication: Molding, Printing, and Other Techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/cr030076o
The paper
Gates, B. D., Xu, Q., Stewart, M., Ryan, D., Willson, C. G., & Whitesides, G. M. (2005). New Approaches to Nanofabrication: Molding, Printing, and Other Techniques. Chemical Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr030076o

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.