The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Long-Time-Step Molecular Dynamics through Hydrogen Mass Repartitioning
Abstract
Previous studies have shown that the method of hydrogen mass repartitioning (HMR) is a potentially useful tool for accelerating molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. By repartitioning the mass of heavy atoms into the bonded hydrogen atoms, it is possible to slow the highest-frequency motions of the macromolecule under study, thus allowing the time step of the simulation to be increased by up to a factor of 2. In this communication, we investigate further how this mass repartitioning allows the simulation time step to be increased in a stable fashion without significantly increasing discretization error. To this end, we ran a set of simulations with different time steps and mass distributions on a three-residue peptide to get a comprehensive view of the effect of mass repartitioning and time step increase on a system whose accessible phase space is fully explored in a relatively short amount of time. We next studied a 129-residue protein, hen egg white lysozyme (HEWL), to verify that the observed behavior extends to a larger, more-realistic, system. Results for the protein include structural comparisons from MD trajectories, as well as comparisons of pKa calculations via constant-pH MD. We also calculated a potential of mean force (PMF) of a dihedral rotation for the MTS [(1-oxyl-2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-pyrroline-3-methyl)methanethiosulfonate] spin label via umbrella sampling with a set of regular MD trajectories, as well as a set of mass-repartitioned trajectories with a time step of 4 fs. Since no significant difference in kinetics or thermodynamics is observed by the use of fast HMR trajectories, further evidence is provided that long-time-step HMR MD simulations are a viable tool for accelerating MD simulations for molecules of biochemical interest.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 43
- Pierce L. C. T., 2012, J. Chem. Theory Comput., 8, 2997, 10.1021/ct300284c · DOI
- Schaeffer R. D., 2008, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 18, 4, 10.1016/j.sbi.2007.11.007 · DOI
- Stone J. E., 2010, J. Mol. Graph. Model., 29, 116, 10.1016/j.jmgm.2010.06.010 · DOI · Paper page
- Götz A. W., 2012, J. Chem. Theory Comput., 8, 1542, 10.1021/ct200909j · DOI · Paper page
- Kubelka J., 2004, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 14, 76, 10.1016/j.sbi.2004.01.013 · DOI · Paper page
- Christ C. D., 2010, J. Comput. Chem., 31, 1569, 10.1002/jcc.21450 · DOI
- Hansen H. S., 2010, J. Comput. Chem., 31, 1, 10.1002/jcc.21253 · DOI
- Ryckaert J.-P., 1977, J. Comput. Phys., 23, 327, 10.1016/0021-9991(77)90098-5 · DOI · Paper page
- Miyamoto S., 1992, J. Comput. Chem., 13, 952, 10.1002/jcc.540130805 · DOI
- Mazur A. K., 1997, J. Comput. Phys., 136, 354, 10.1006/jcph.1997.5740 · DOI
- Engle R. D., 2005, J. Comput. Phys., 206, 432, 10.1016/j.jcp.2004.12.009 · DOI
- Skeel R. D., 2001, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 23, 1172, 10.1137/S106482750138318X · DOI
- Gans J., 2000, Phys. Rev. E, 61, 4587, 10.1103/PhysRevE.61.4587 · DOI
- Hünenberger P. H., 2005, Adv. Polym. Sci., 173, 105, 10.1007/b99427 · DOI · Paper page
- Bussi G., 2007, Phys. Rev. E, 75, 056707, 10.1103/PhysRevE.75.056707 · DOI · Paper page
- Melchionna S., 2007, J. Chem. Phys., 127, 044108, 10.1063/1.2753496 · DOI
- Jacucci, G.; Rahman, A.Report on Workshop Methods in Molecular Dynamics—Long Timescale Events, Orsay, France, 1974; pp32–40.
- Bennett C. H., 1975, J. Comput. Phys., 19, 267, 10.1016/0021-9991(75)90077-7 · DOI
- Water: A Comprehensive Treatise;Franks, F., Ed.Springer:Boston, MA, 1979; p279.
- Pomès R., 1990, Chem. Phys. Lett., 166, 425, 10.1016/0009-2614(90)85055-H · DOI
- Mao B., 1990, Biophys. J., 58, 803, 10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82424-3 · DOI
- Mao B., 1991, Biopolymers, 31, 1077, 10.1002/bip.360310907 · DOI
- Mao B., 1991, Biophys. J., 60, 611, 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82090-2 · DOI
- Feenstra K. A., 1999, J. Comput. Chem., 20, 786, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199906)20:8<786::AID-JCC5>3.0.CO;2-B · DOI
- Hess B., 2008, J. Chem. Theory Comput., 4, 435, 10.1021/ct700301q · DOI · Paper page
- Harvey M. J., 2009, J. Chem. Theory Comput., 5, 1632, 10.1021/ct9000685 · DOI
- Rao F., 2012, J. Comput. Chem., 33, 475, 10.1002/jcc.21990 · DOI
- Salomon-Ferrer R., 2013, J. Chem. Theory Comput., 9, 3878, 10.1021/ct400314y · DOI · Paper page
- Le Grand S., 2013, Comput. Phys. Commun., 184, 374, 10.1016/j.cpc.2012.09.022 · DOI · Paper page
- Cornell W. D., 1995, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 117, 5179, 10.1021/ja00124a002 · DOI · Paper page
- Hornak V., 2006, Proteins, 65, 712, 10.1002/prot.21123 · DOI
- Wang J., 2004, J. Comput. Chem., 25, 1157, 10.1002/jcc.20035 · DOI · Paper page
- Bayly C. I., 1993, J. Phys. Chem., 97, 10269, 10.1021/j100142a004 · DOI
- Hopkins C. W., 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 54, 1978, 10.1021/ci500112w · DOI
- Roe D. R., 2013, J. Chem. Theory Comput., 9, 3084, 10.1021/ct400341p · DOI
- Jorgensen W. L., 1983, J. Chem. Phys., 79, 926, 10.1063/1.445869 · DOI · Paper page
- Young A. C. M., 1993, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 26, 309, 10.1107/S0021889892010070 · DOI
- Mongan J., 2004, J. Comput. Chem., 25, 2038, 10.1002/jcc.20139 · DOI
- Ding F., 2008, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 130, 7184, 10.1021/ja800893d · DOI
- Sezer D., 2008, J. Phys. Chem. B, 112, 5755, 10.1021/jp711375x · DOI
- Pedretti A., 2004, J. Comput. Aided. Mol. Des., 18, 167, 10.1023/B:JCAM.0000035186.90683.f2 · DOI
- Roux B., 1995, Comput. Phys. Commun., 91, 275, 10.1016/0010-4655(95)00053-I · DOI · Paper page
- Lin I.-C., 2010, J. Phys. Chem. B, 114, 15935, 10.1021/jp109865y · DOI
Cited by
Structure of hepcidin-bound ferroportin reveals iron homeostatic mechanisms
Billesbølle, C. B., Azumaya, C. M., Kretsch, R. C., Powers, A. S., Gonen, S., Schneider, S., Arvedson, T., Dror, R. O., Cheng, Y., & Manglik, A. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2668-z · Cited by 344
Scalable emulation of protein equilibrium ensembles with generative deep learning
Lewis, S., Hempel, T., Jiménez-Luna, J., Gastegger, M., Xie, Y., Foong, A. Y. K., Satorras, V. G., Abdin, O., Veeling, B. S., Zaporozhets, I., et al. (2025) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adv9817 · Cited by 390
Structural and Functional Analysis of a β2-Adrenergic Receptor Complex with GRK5
Komolov, K. E., Du, Y., Duc, N. M., Betz, R. M., Rodrigues, J. P. G. L. M., Leib, R. D., Patra, D., Skiniotis, G., Adams, C. M., Dror, R. O., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.03.047 · Cited by 152
Structural basis for channel conduction in the pump-like channelrhodopsin ChRmine
Kishi, K. E., Kim, Y. S., Fukuda, M., Inoue, M., Kusakizako, T., Wang, P. Y., Ramakrishnan, C., Byrne, E. F. X., Thadhani, E., Paggi, J. M., et al. (2022) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.01.007 · Cited by 149
A structural mechanism for directing corepressor-selective inverse agonism of PPARγ
Brust, R., Shang, J., Fuhrmann, J., Mosure, S. A., Bass, J., Cano, A., Heidari, Z., Chrisman, I. M., Nemetchek, M. D., Blayo, A.-L., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07133-w · Cited by 94
Cryptic pocket formation underlies allosteric modulator selectivity at muscarinic GPCRs
Hollingsworth, S. A., Kelly, B., Valant, C., Michaelis, J. A., Mastromihalis, O., Thompson, G., Venkatakrishnan, A. J., Hertig, S., Scammells, P. J., Sexton, P. M., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11062-7 · Cited by 73
In Silico Modeling and Scoring of PROTAC-Mediated Ternary Complex Poses
Liao, J., Nie, X., Unarta, I. C., Ericksen, S. S., & Tang, W. (2022) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c02155 · Cited by 62
The Plasma Membrane as a Competitive Inhibitor and Positive Allosteric Modulator of KRas4B Signaling
Neale, C., & García, A. E. (2020) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2019.12.039 · Cited by 56
Wang, K., Dagil, R., Lavstsen, T., Misra, S. K., Spliid, C. B., Wang, Y., Gustavsson, T., Sandoval, D. R., Vidal-Calvo, E. E., Choudhary, S., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23254-1 · Cited by 52
Pro-phagocytic function and structural basis of GPR84 signaling
Zhang, X., Wang, Y., Supekar, S., Cao, X., Zhou, J., Dang, J., Chen, S., Jenkins, L., Marsango, S., Li, X., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-41201-0 · Cited by 46
Structural and thermodynamic framework for PIEZO1 modulation by small molecules
Jiang, W., Wijerathne, T. D., Zhang, H., Lin, Y.-C., Jo, S., Im, W., Lacroix, J. J., & Luo, Y. L. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2310933120 · Cited by 44
Brown, B. P., Stein, R. A., Meiler, J., & Mchaourab, H. S. (2024) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.3c01081 · Cited by 41
Ko, K.-T., Lennartz, F., Mekhaiel, D., Guloglu, B., Marini, A., Deuker, D. J., Long, C. A., Jore, M. M., Miura, K., Biswas, S., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-33379-6 · Cited by 32
Nemergut, M., Marques, S. M., Uhrik, L., Vanova, T., Nezvedova, M., Gadara, D. C., Jha, D., Tulis, J., Novakova, V., Planas-Iglesias, J., et al. (2023) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s13024-023-00620-9 · Cited by 30
Oncogenic KEAP1 mutations activate TRAF2-NFκB signaling to prevent apoptosis in lung cancer cells
Deen, A. J., Adinolfi, S., Härkönen, J., Patinen, T., Liu, X., Laitinen, T., Takabe, P., Kainulainen, K., Pasonen-Seppänen, S., Gawriyski, L. M., et al. (2024) · Redox Biology · doi:10.1016/j.redox.2024.103031 · Cited by 27
Li, A., & Gilson, M. K. (2018) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.5027439 · Cited by 24
“With the multiple-GPU version of AMBER PMEMD [28], and long (4 fs) time steps made possible by hydrogen mass repartitioning [29], we were able to achieve up to 450 ns of simulation per day, and generated about 250 μs cumulative simulation time for each bound system.”
MethodLópez, C. A., Zhang, X., Aydin, F., Shrestha, R., Van, Q. N., Stanley, C. B., Carpenter, T. S., Nguyen, K., Patel, L. A., Chen, D., et al. (2022) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00168 · Cited by 18
Functional regulation of aquaporin dynamics by lipid bilayer composition
Nguyen, A. T. P., Weigle, A. T., & Shukla, D. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-46027-y · Cited by 21
Wang, S., Wang, K., Song, K., Lai, Z. W., Li, P., Li, D., Sun, Y., Mei, Y., Xu, C., & Liao, M. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-51948-9 · Cited by 18
Rational design of 19F NMR labelling sites to probe protein structure and interactions
Streit, J. O., Chan, S. H. S., Daya, S., & Christodoulou, J. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-59105-6 · Cited by 17
Chan, M. C., Procko, E., & Shukla, D. (2022) · ACS Chemical Neuroscience · doi:10.1021/acschemneuro.1c00714 · Cited by 17
Short RNA chaperones promote aggregation-resistant TDP-43 conformers to mitigate neurodegeneration
Copley, K. E., Mauna, J. C., Danielson, H. L., Chen, Q., Ozguney, B., Ngo, M., Xie, L., Smirnov, A., Davis, M., Mayne, L., et al. (2026) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adv3301 · Cited by 16
A Putative Binding Model of Nitazene Derivatives at the μ-Opioid Receptor
Clayton, J., Shi, L., Robertson, M. J., Skiniotis, G., Michaelides, M., Stavitskaya, L., & Shen, J. (2025) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2025.110437 · Cited by 12
Pakuła, K., Sequeiros-Borja, C., Biała-Leonhard, W., Pawela, A., Banasiak, J., Bailly, A., Radom, M., Geisler, M., Brezovsky, J., & Jasiński, M. (2023) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-023-04751-6 · Cited by 11
A conformational fingerprint for amyloidogenic light chains
(2024) · doi:10.7554/elife.102002 · Cited by 9
Dutagaci, B., Duan, B., Qiu, C., Kaplan, C. D., & Feig, M. (2023) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010999 · Cited by 7
Control of Golgi- V-ATPase through Sac1-dependent co-regulation of PI(4)P and cholesterol
Zhou, X., van der Stoel, M. M., Kaptan, S., Li, H., Li, S., Hölttä, M., Vihinen, H., Jokitalo, E., Thiele, C., Pietiläinen, O., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-63125-7 · Cited by 6
“The models were simulated using the GROMACS 2022.3 engine 91 using the Verlet scheme and the hydrogen mass repartitioning method 92 to achieve a 4 fs timestep.”
InfluentialComputational Procedure for Predicting Excipient Effects on Protein–Protein Affinities
Dignon, G. L., & Dill, K. A. (2024) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.3c01197 · Cited by 5
Ko, K.-T., Lennartz, F., Mekhaiel, D., Guloglu, B., Marini, A., Deuker, D. J., Long, C. A., Jore, M. M., Miura, K., Biswas, S., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.05.24.493318 · Cited by 4
Molecular exaptation by the integrin αI domain
Hollis, J. A., Chan, M. C., Malik, H. S., & Campbell, M. G. (2025) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adx9567 · Cited by 4
Baweja, L., & Wereszczynski, J. (2025) · Epigenetics & Chromatin · doi:10.1186/s13072-025-00635-0 · Cited by 3
A novel peptidoglycan deacetylase modulates daughter cell separation in E. coli
Hernández-Rocamora, V. M., Martorana, A. M., Belloso, A., Ballesteros, D., Zaccaria, M., Perez, A. J., Iorga, B. I., Abia, D., Gray, J., Breukink, E., et al. (2025) · PLOS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1011626 · Cited by 2
The impact of RNA chemical probing reagents on RNA-binding proteins
Klingler, D., Fallon, L., Cohn, D., Crawford, A., Marcus, L., & Jones, A. N. (2025) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2025.110468 · Cited by 2
Yamauchi, M., Brandani, G. B., Terakawa, T., & Takada, S. (2026) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.106752
Scalable emulation of protein equilibrium ensembles with generative deep learning
Lewis, S., Hempel, T., Jiménez Luna, J., Gastegger, M., Xie, Y., Foong, A. Y. K., García Satorras, V., Abdin, O., Veeling, B. S., Zaporozhets, I., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.12.05.626885 · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- Hopkins, C. W., Le Grand, S., Walker, R. C., & Roitberg, A. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-03-30
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1864-1874
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-9626
- OpenAlex
- W1969189143
- Cited by
- 1,355
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Funders
- Office of Cyberinfrastructure (OCI 07-25070, OCI-1147910)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.