The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Arsenic(III) and Arsenic(V) Reactions with Zerovalent Iron Corrosion Products
Abstract
Zerovalent iron (Fe0) has tremendous potential as a remediation material for removal of arsenic from groundwater and drinking water. This study investigates the speciation of arsenate (As(V)) and arsenite (As(III)) after reaction with two Fe0 materials, their iron oxide corrosion products, and several model iron oxides. A variety of analytical techniques were used to study the reaction products including HPLC-hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry, X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy-energy-dispersive X-ray analysis, and X-ray absorption spectroscopy. The products of corrosion of Fe0 include lepidocrocite (gamma-FeOOH), magnetite (Fe3O4), and/or maghemite (gamma-Fe2O3), all of which indicate Fe(II) oxidation as an intermediate step in the Fe0 corrosion process. The in-situ Fe0 corrosion reaction caused a high As(III) and As(V) uptake with both Fe0 materials studied. Under aerobic conditions, the Fe0 corrosion reaction did not cause As(V) reduction to As(III) but did cause As(III) oxidation to As(V). Oxidation of As(III) was also caused by maghemite and hematite minerals indicating that the formation of certain iron oxides during Fe0 corrosion favors the As(V) species. Water reduction and the release of OH- to solution on the surface of corroding Fe0 may also promote As(III) oxidation. Analysis of As(III) and As(V) adsorption complexes in the Fe0 corrosion products and synthetic iron oxides by extended X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy (EXAFS) gave predominant As-Fe interatomic distances of 3.30-3.36 A. This was attributed to inner-sphere, bidentate As(III) and As(V) complexes. The results of this study suggest that Fe0 can be used as a versatile and economical sorbent for in-situ treatment of groundwater containing As(III) and As(V).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Arsenate and Chromate Retention Mechanisms on Goethite. 1. Surface Structure
Fendorf, S., Eick, M. J., Grossl, P., & Sparks, D. L. (1997) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es950653t · Cited by 1,017
Cited by
Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents—A critical review
Mohan, D., & Pittman, C. U. (2007) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.006 · Cited by 3,536
Chemical stabilization of metals and arsenic in contaminated soils using oxides–a review
Komárek, M., Vaněk, A., & Ettler, V. (2013) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2012.07.045 · Cited by 602
Leupin, O. X., & Hug, S. J. (2005) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2005.02.012 · Cited by 421
Intraparticle diffusion and adsorption of arsenate onto granular ferric hydroxide (GFH)
Badruzzaman, M., Westerhoff, P., & Knappe, D. R. U. (2004) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2004.07.007 · Cited by 366
Simultaneous inner- and outer-sphere arsenate adsorption on corundum and hematite
Catalano, J. G., Park, C., Fenter, P., & Zhang, Z. (2008) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2008.02.013 · Cited by 245
Metadata
- Authors
- Manning, B. A., Hunt, M. L., Amrhein, C., & Yarmoff, J. A.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-11-07
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 5455-5461
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1999959177
- Cited by
- 428
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Arsenic(III) and Arsenic(V) Reactions with Zerovalent Iron Corrosion Products. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es0206846
- The paper
- Manning, B. A., Hunt, M. L., Amrhein, C., & Yarmoff, J. A. (2002). Arsenic(III) and Arsenic(V) Reactions with Zerovalent Iron Corrosion Products. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0206846
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.