CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 81

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Solubility and Sorption by Soils of 8:2 Fluorotelomer Alcohol in Water and Cosolvent Systems

Liu, Jinxia, Lee, Linda S.·2005·Environmental Science & Technology
DOI 10.1021/es051125c
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The solubility and sorption by five soils of 8:2 fluorotelomer alcohol (FTOH) were measured from water and cosolvent/ water solutions. Aqueous solubility and soil-water distribution coefficients (Kd,w, L kg(-1)) were extrapolated from cosolvent data using a log-linear cosolvency model and compared to direct aqueous measurements. Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry with electrospray ionization was employed to analyze the 8:2 FTOH in solutions and soil extracts. The cosolvent-extrapolated water solubility is 0.224 mg L(-1), in good agreement with the measured value of 0.194 mg L(-1). All sorption isotherms were generally linear regardless of cosolvent composition or soil organic carbon (OC) content. Kd,w values extrapolated from cosolvent data were similar but consistently higher than those measured in aqueous solutions. The latter was hypothesized to be due to dissolved OC (DOC) in the aqueous slurries. An average log KDOC of 5.30 was estimated and supported by DOC and Kd,w measurements at two soil-water ratios. Sorption appeared to be driven by hydrophobic partitioning with a log KOC value of 4.13 +/- 0.16. Irreversible sorption was also observed and appeared to be related to OC content, with the extraction efficiency reduced from 85% to 45% with increasing contact time from 3 to 72 h for the highest OC soil.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es051125c

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sorption of PFAS such as telomers can be relatively large, due primarily to organic-carbon partitioning associated with hydrophobic interactions.

    “For example, the sorption of PFAS such as the telomers can be relatively large, due primarily to organic-carbon partitioning associated with hydrophobic interactions (e.g., Liu and Lee, 2005, Goss et al., 2006).”

    From Assessing the potential contributions of additional retention processes to PFAS retardation in the subsurface (2018) · cites this paper as Liu and Lee, 2005

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Kannan K., 2004, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 1264, 10.1021/es0354061 · DOI
  2. Olsen G. W., 2003, Environ. Health Perspect., 111, 1901, 10.1289/ehp.6316 · DOI
  3. Martin J. W., 2002, Anal. Chem., 74, 590
  4. Stock N. L., 2004, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 996
  5. Hansen K. J., 2002, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 1685, 10.1021/es010780r · DOI
  6. Higgins C. P., 2005, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 3956, 10.1021/es048245p · DOI
  7. Dinglasan M. J. A., 2004, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 2864
  8. Wang N., 2005, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 538
  9. Kaiser M. A., 2004, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 49, 916, 10.1021/je034222z · DOI
  10. Kissa E., 1994, Fluorinated Surfactants and Repellents
  11. Wang N., 2004, Proceedings of the Fourth World Congress and 25th North American Annual Conference of SETAC
  12. Li H., 1999, Environ. Sci. Technol., 33, 1870
  13. Means J. C., 1980, Environ. Sci. Technol., 14, 1528, 10.1021/es60172a005 · DOI
  14. Klute A., 1986, Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1-Physical and Mineralogical Method, 10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed · DOI
  15. Sparks D. L., 1996, Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 3-Chemical Methods, 10.2136/sssabookser5.3 · DOI
  16. Yalkowsky S. H., 1972, J. Pharm. Sci., 61, 984, 10.1002/jps.2600610644 · DOI
  17. Yalkowsky S., 1999, Solubility and Solubilization in Aqueous Media, 230
  18. Rao P. S. C., 1985, J. Environ. Qual., 14, 383
  19. Nkedi-Kizza P., 1985, Environ. Sci. Technol., 19, 979, 10.1021/es00140a015 · DOI
  20. Nkedi-Kizza P., 1989, Environ. Sci. Technol., 23, 820, 10.1021/es00065a009 · DOI
  21. Lee L. S., 1990, Environ. Sci. Technol., 24, 661, 10.1021/es00075a007 · DOI
  22. Fu J. K., 1986, ASCE J. Environ. Eng., 112, 366
  23. Powley C., 2004, Proceedings of the Fourth World Congress and 25th North American Annual Conference of SETAC
  24. Szostek B., 2004, J. Chromatogr., B., 813, 321, 10.1016/j.jchromb.2004.10.031 · DOI
  25. Szostek B., 2004, Proceedings of the SETAC Europe 14th Annual Meeting, Prague, Czech Republic, April 18−22
  26. Fu J. K., 1986, ASCE J. Environ. Eng., 112, 345
  27. Chin Y.-P., 1991, Organic Substances and Sediments in Water, 273
  28. Seol Y., 2000, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 64, 1983, 10.2136/sssaj2000.6461976x · DOI
  29. Woodburn K. B., 1989, Environ. Sci. Technol., 23, 413, 10.1021/es00181a004 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Liu, J., & Lee, L. S.
Affiliations
Department of Agronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-2054
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2005-08-27
Volume
39
Issue
19
Pages
7535-7540
ISSN
  • 0013-936X
  • 1520-5851
DOI
10.1021/es051125c
Cited by
81
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review