The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Temporal and Spatial Trends in the Occurrence of Human and Veterinary Antibiotics in Aqueous and River Sediment Matrices
Abstract
The occurrence of 15 antibiotics belonging to three different groups, tetracyclines (TCs), sulfonamides (SAs), and macrolides (MLs), mainly used to prevent or treat illness for humans and also to control disease or to promote the growth for animals was studied in aqueous and sediment matrices. The result of spatial and temporal statistical analysis revealed that measured concentrations of individual antibiotics were significantly different depending on sampling location and time periods for aqueous and sediment samples. High concentrations of human-used antibiotics were detected downstream of a wastewater treatment plant, and animal-used antibiotics were mainly found in a region with significant agricultural activity. Generally, the highest concentrations of antibiotics for both water and sediment samples were measured in winter indicating that low flow conditions and cold-water temperatures might enhance the persistence of these compounds. Furthermore, a pseudo-partitioning coefficient(P-PC) was introduced to provide a better understanding of the partitioning of antibiotics into the sediment. Different P-PC values were found depending on the sorption characteristics of the individual antibiotics. Sediment samples showed a greater detection frequency and a much higher concentration compared to aqueous samples taken at the same site. Since microorganism antibiotic resistance can develop in sediments, the importance of analyzing this matrix is underscored.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kolpin, D. W., Furlong, E. T., Meyer, M. T., Thurman, E. M., Zaugg, S. D., Barber, L. B., & Buxton, H. T. (2002) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es011055j · Cited by 7,953
Occurrence of Antibiotics in the Aquatic Environment
Hirsch, R., Ternes, T., Haberer, K., & Kratz, K.-L. (1999) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/s0048-9697(98)00337-4 · Cited by 2,140
KOLPIN, D., SKOPEC, M., MEYER, M., FURLONG, E., & ZAUGG, S. (2004) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.01.015 · Cited by 579
Cited by
Luo, Y., Xu, L., Rysz, M., Wang, Y., Zhang, H., & Alvarez, P. J. J. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es104009s · Cited by 964
Klosterhaus, S. L., Grace, R., Hamilton, M. C., & Yee, D. (2013) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2013.01.009 · Cited by 368
Chen, H., Jing, L., Teng, Y., & Wang, J. (2018) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.054 · Cited by 325
Antibiotic resistance in urban runoff
Almakki, A., Jumas-Bilak, E., Marchandin, H., & Licznar-Fajardo, P. (2019) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.183 · Cited by 194
Aquatic Environmental Risk Assessment for Human Use of the Old Antibiotic Sulfamethoxazole in Europe
Straub, J. O. (2015) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.2945 · Cited by 154
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, S.-C., & Carlson, K.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-12-05
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 50-57
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2041526151
- Cited by
- 535
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Temporal and Spatial Trends in the Occurrence of Human and Veterinary Antibiotics in Aqueous and River Sediment Matrices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/es060737+
- The paper
- Kim, S.-C., & Carlson, K. (2007). Temporal and Spatial Trends in the Occurrence of Human and Veterinary Antibiotics in Aqueous and River Sediment Matrices. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/es060737%2B
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.