The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Behavioral and Physiological Changes in Daphnia magna when Exposed to Nanoparticle Suspensions (Titanium Dioxide, Nano-C60, and C60HxC70Hx)
Open accessAbstract
Little is known aboutthe impact manufactured nanoparticles will have on aquatic organisms. Previously, we demonstrated that toxicity differs with nanoparticle type and preparation and observed behavioral changes upon exposure to the more lethal nanoparticle suspensions. In this experiment, we quantified these behavioral and physiological responses of Daphnia magna at sublethal nanoparticle concentrations. Titanium dioxide (TiO2) and fullerenes (nano-C60) were chosen for their potential use in technology. Other studies suggest that addition of functional groups to particles can affect their toxicity to cell cultures, but it is unknown if the same is true at the whole organism level. Therefore, a fullerene derivative, C60HxC70Hx, was also used to examine how functional groups affect Daphnia response. Using a high-speed camera, we quantified several behavior and physiological parameters including hopping frequency, feeding appendage and postabdominal curling movement, and heart rate. Nano-C60 was the only suspension to cause a significant change in heart rate. Exposure to both nano-C60 and C60HxC70Hx suspensions caused hopping frequency and appendage movement to increase. These results are associated with increased risk of predation and reproductive decline. They indicate that certain nanoparticle types may have impacts on population and food web dynamics in aquatic systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nanomaterials in the environment: Behavior, fate, bioavailability, and effects
Klaine, S. J., Alvarez, P. J. J., Batley, G. E., Fernandes, T. F., Handy, R. D., Lyon, D. Y., Mahendra, S., McLaughlin, M. J., & Lead, J. R. (2008) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1897/08-090.1 · Cited by 2,764
Farré, M. L., Pérez, S., Kantiani, L., & Barceló, D. (2008) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2008.09.010 · Cited by 1,009
The ecotoxicology and chemistry of manufactured nanoparticles
Handy, R. D., von der Kammer, F., Lead, J. R., Hassellöv, M., Owen, R., & Crane, M. (2008) · Ecotoxicology · doi:10.1007/s10646-008-0199-8 · Cited by 916
Handy, R. D., Owen, R., & Valsami-Jones, E. (2008) · Ecotoxicology · doi:10.1007/s10646-008-0206-0 · Cited by 888
Nanotechnology and in Situ Remediation: A Review of the Benefits and Potential Risks
Karn, B., Kuiken, T., & Otto, M. (2009) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.0900793 · Cited by 721
Du, W., Sun, Y., Ji, R., Zhu, J., Wu, J., & Guo, H. (2011) · Journal of Environmental Monitoring · doi:10.1039/c0em00611d · Cited by 607
Wang, J., Liu, Y., Jiao, F., Lao, F., Li, W., Gu, Y., Li, Y., Ge, C., Zhou, G., Li, B., et al. (2008) · Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.tox.2008.09.014 · Cited by 450
Ecotoxicity of nanosized TiO2. Review of in vivo data
Menard, A., Drobne, D., & Jemec, A. (2011) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2010.11.027 · Cited by 403
Nasser, F., & Lynch, I. (2016) · Journal of Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2015.09.005 · Cited by 345
Boxall, A. B., Tiede, K., & Chaudhry, Q. (2007) · Nanomedicine · doi:10.2217/17435889.2.6.919 · Cited by 344
Review: Do engineered nanoparticles pose a significant threat to the aquatic environment?
Scown, T. M., van Aerle, R., & Tyler, C. R. (2010) · Critical Reviews in Toxicology · doi:10.3109/10408444.2010.494174 · Cited by 332
Toxicity of nano-TiO2 on algae and the site of reactive oxygen species production
Li, F., Liang, Z., Zheng, X., Zhao, W., Wu, M., & Wang, Z. (2015) · Aquatic Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2014.10.014 · Cited by 326
Ecotoxicity of selected nano‐materials to aquatic organisms
Blaise, C., Gagné, F., Férard, J. F., & Eullaffroy, P. (2008) · Environmental Toxicology · doi:10.1002/tox.20402 · Cited by 306
Mudunkotuwa, I. A., Minshid, A. A., & Grassian, V. H. (2014) · The Analyst · doi:10.1039/c3an01684f · Cited by 278
Bhatt, I., & Tripathi, B. N. (2011) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.10.011 · Cited by 279
Bioavailability of Nanoscale Metal Oxides TiO2, CeO2, and ZnO to Fish
Johnston, B. D., Scown, T. M., Moger, J., Cumberland, S. A., Baalousha, M., Linge, K., van Aerle, R., Jarvis, K., Lead, J. R., & Tyler, C. R. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es901971a · Cited by 275
Canesi, L., Fabbri, R., Gallo, G., Vallotto, D., Marcomini, A., & Pojana, G. (2010) · Aquatic Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.04.009 · Cited by 255
Dabrunz, A., Duester, L., Prasse, C., Seitz, F., Rosenfeldt, R., Schilde, C., Schaumann, G. E., & Schulz, R. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020112 · Cited by 208
Polystyrene microplastics ingestion induced behavioral effects to the cladoceran Daphnia magna
De Felice, B., Sabatini, V., Antenucci, S., Gattoni, G., Santo, N., Bacchetta, R., Ortenzi, M. A., & Parolini, M. (2019) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.115 · Cited by 190
Gutierrez, M. F., Ale, A., Andrade, V., Bacchetta, C., Rossi, A., & Cazenave, J. (2021) · Water Environment Research · doi:10.1002/wer.1637 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Lovern, S. B., Strickler, J. R., & Klaper, R.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-05-19
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4465-4470
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2042400913
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.