Cited by 53Extraction and Separation ProcessesSustainability and Ecological Systems AnalysisEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability

Exploring the potential for improving material utilization efficiency to secure lithium supply for China’s battery supply chain

Open access
Sun, Xin, Hao, Han, Geng, Yong, Liu, Zongwei, Zhao, Fuquan·2024·Fundamental Research

Abstract

Lithium-ion battery (LIB) is the key technology for climate change mitigation. The sustainability of LIB supply chain has caused widespread concern since the material utilization efficiency of LIB supply chain has not been well investigated. This study aims to fill this research gap by conducting a dynamic material flow analysis of lithium in China from 2015 to 2021. Results indicate that within the temporal boundary, lithium flow and in-use stock grew significantly in China due to the rapid development of the EV market, with lithium flow in domestic production of basic chemicals increasing by 614% to 100 kt, end-use consumption increasing by 160% to 35 kt, and in-use stock increasing by 62% to 195 kt. China has been a net importer of lithium, of which cumulative imports and exports were 343 kt and 169 kt, respectively. In addition, 103 kt of lithium was converted to inventories or was lost during the processing from 2015 to 2021. By optimizing inventory and processing, developing substitutes for lithium for non-battery applications, and improving lithium recycling, China's net import dependency of lithium could be reduced from 27%-86% to 0%-16%. Our study demonstrates that it is urgent to improve material utilization efficiency so that the lithium resource supply can be secured.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fmre.2022.12.008

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Models have been used to manage the materials in the supply chain for efficient production.

    “Models have been used to manage the materials in the supply chain for efficient production [80-83].”

    From Lithium Supply Chain Optimization: A Global Analysis of Critical Minerals for Batteries (2024) · cites this paper as [82]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says the study uses material flow analysis to trace lithium through China’s battery supply chain and identify ways to improve material utilization. It supports the use of a model to inform more efficient production, but does not show that models were used to manage materials in production. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sun, X., Hao, H., Geng, Y., Liu, Z., & Zhao, F.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Hao, Han
  • Geng, Yong
Venue
Fundamental Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-01
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
167-177
ISSN
  • 2096-9457 (ISSN-L)
  • 2667-3258
OpenAlex
W4312132018
Cited by
53
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 6
FWCI
3.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fundamental Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (71774100, 71810107001, 72088101, 72122010)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFC1908501)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Keywords
lithium supply, lithium-ion batteries, battery supply chain, material utilization efficiency, lithium inventory, lithium recycling, electric vehicles, resource security, China

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review