CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 100

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Characterization of Two Passive Air Samplers for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances

Ahrens, Lutz, Harner, Tom, Shoeib, Mahiba, Koblizkova, Martina, Reiner, Eric J.·2013·Environmental Science & Technology
DOI 10.1021/es4048945
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Two passive air sampler (PAS) media were characterized under field conditions for the measurement of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in the atmosphere. The PASs, consisting of polyurethane foam (PUF) and sorbent-impregnated PUF (SIP) disks, were deployed for over one year in parallel with high volume active air samplers (HV-AAS) and low volume active air samplers (LV-AAS). Samples were analyzed for perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids (PFCAs), perfluoroalkane sulfonic acids (PFSAs), fluorotelomer alcohols (FTOHs), fluorotelomer methacrylates (FTMACs), fluorotelomer acrylates (FTACs), perfluorooctane sulfonamides (FOSAs), and perfluorooctane sulfonamidoethanols (FOSEs). Sampling rates and the passive sampler medium (PSM)-air partition coefficient (KPSM-A) were calculated for individual PFASs. Sampling rates were similar for PFASs present in the gas phase and particle phase, and the linear sampling rate of 4 m(-3) d(-1) is recommended for calculating effective air sample volumes in the SIP-PAS and PUF-PAS for PFASs except for the FOSAs and FOSEs in the PUF-PAS. SIP disks showed very good performance for all tested PFASs while PUF disks were suitable only for the PFSAs and their precursors. Experiments evaluating the suitability of different isotopically labeled fluorinated depuration compounds (DCs) revealed that (13)C8-perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) was suitable for the calculation of site-specific sampling rates. Ambient temperature was the dominant factor influencing t…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es4048945

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Solute descriptors are unavailable for other PFAS, including frequently detected fluorotelomer compounds and perfluoroalkanesulfonamides (PFASAs) with different substitution patterns.

    “Solute descriptors are unavailable for other PFAS, including those that have been frequently detected in the environment such as other fluorotelomer compounds and perfluoroalkanesulfonamides (PFASAs) with different substitution patterns.15−17”

    From Intermolecular Interactions, Solute Descriptors, and Partition Properties of Neutral Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) (2023) · cites this paper as [17]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Houde M., 2006, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 3463, 10.1021/es052580b · DOI
  2. Prevedouros K., 2006, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 32, 10.1021/es0512475 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Ahrens L., 2011, J. Environ. Monit., 13, 20, 10.1039/C0EM00373E · DOI · Paper page
  4. Shoeib M., 2011, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 7999, 10.1021/es103562v · DOI · Paper page
  5. Wang Z., 2012, Environ. Pollut., 169, 204, 10.1016/j.envpol.2012.03.037 · DOI
  6. Müller C. E., 2012, Environ. Pollut., 169, 196, 10.1016/j.envpol.2012.04.010 · DOI
  7. Barber J. L., 2007, J. Environ. Monit., 9, 530, 10.1039/b701417a · DOI · Paper page
  8. Arp H. P. H., 2008, Atmos. Environ., 42, 6869, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.05.012 · DOI
  9. Ahrens L., 2011, Anal. Chem., 83, 9622, 10.1021/ac202414w · DOI
  10. Pozo K., 2006, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 4867, 10.1021/es060447t · DOI
  11. Genualdi S., 2010, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 5534, 10.1021/es1009696 · DOI
  12. Pozo K., 2009, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 796, 10.1021/es802106a · DOI
  13. Shoeib M., 2002, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 4142, 10.1021/es020635t · DOI
  14. Klánová J., 2008, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 550, 10.1021/es072098o · DOI
  15. Chaemfa C., 2008, Environ. Pollut., 156, 1290, 10.1016/j.envpol.2008.03.016 · DOI
  16. Moeckel C., 2009, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 3227, 10.1021/es802897x · DOI
  17. Zhang X., 2011, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 10509, 10.1021/es2032373 · DOI
  18. Zhang X., 2012, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 9563, 10.1021/es302334r · DOI
  19. Bartkow M. E., 2005, Chemosphere, 60, 170, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.12.033 · DOI
  20. Petrich N. T., 2013, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 8591
  21. Koblizkova M., 2012, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 391, 10.1021/es2032289 · DOI
  22. Hayward S. J., 2011, Atmos. Environ., 45, 296, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.10.028 · DOI
  23. McMurdo C. J., 2008, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 3969, 10.1021/es7032026 · DOI · Paper page
  24. He J., 2010, Atmos. Environ., 44, 884, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.12.009 · DOI
  25. Bohlin P., 2010, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 749, 10.1021/es902318g · DOI
  26. Chaemfa C., 2009, J. Environ. Monit., 11, 1135, 10.1039/b823016a · DOI
  27. Harner T., 2013, Atmos. Environ., 75, 123, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.04.012 · DOI
  28. Tuduri L., 2006, Environ. Pollut., 144, 377, 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.12.047 · DOI
  29. Li J., 2011, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 7241, 10.1021/es201739t · DOI · Paper page
  30. Jahnke A., 2007, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 745, 10.1021/es0619861 · DOI
  31. D’eon J., 2009, Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 28, 2101, 10.1897/09-048.1 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Möller A., 2010, Environ. Pollut., 158, 3243, 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.07.019 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Ahrens L., 2011, Anal. Chem., 83, 9622, 10.1021/ac202414w · DOI
  34. Vierke L., 2011, Environ. Chem., 8, 363, 10.1071/EN10133 · DOI
  35. Dreyer A., 2009, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 4029, 10.1021/es900257w · DOI
  36. Ahrens L., 2011, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 8098, 10.1021/es1036173 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ahrens, L., Harner, T., Shoeib, M., Koblizkova, M., & Reiner, E. J.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2013-11-26
Volume
47
Issue
24
Pages
14024-14033
ISSN
  • 0013-936X
  • 1520-5851
DOI
10.1021/es4048945
Cited by
100
References
5
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review